Re: [media-types] Planning for IETF 112: Agenda?

[Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]>]

Thank you!

Indeed, as Martin says, "engaged in the IETF" is a property of people, 
not organizations - organizations are important in order to answer the 
question of "will this effort actually make people change what they're 
doing", but the work in the IETF is always done by people.

I've noted that you're volunteering to edit draft-w3cidwg, and will add 
the question of adopting this as a WG document to the agenda.

See you at IETF 112!

On 10/9/21 5:04 AM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 10/8/21 4:56 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>
>> I've put together a "work items with assigned shepherds" document here:
>>
>> https://github.com/alvestrand/mediaman/blob/main/work-items.md
>>
>> As you can see, it's rather empty on the "assignments" front.
>
> wrt. draft-w3cidwg-media-types-with-multiple-suffixes
>
> You can probably safely include the W3C Decentralized Identifiers WG 
> and W3C Verifiable Credentials WG as "engaged" as they are waiting on 
> guidance from mediaman to register their mediatypes.
>
> I'm willing to take the pen on the document (it's "done" in that the 
> current text seems to be acceptable to most and we were waiting on 
> broader feedback to confirm that theory). I can also ask Amy Guy if 
> she's willing to continue editing that document as well.
>
> Is there any other input that you need at this point?
>
> -- manu
>