Re: [media-types] [IANA #1229076] IANA: early allocation requests (was: Re: Rob pls. approve: Re: Rob/Warren: Early allocation request for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher (according to RFC7120))

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 06 April 2022 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2753A1AC8 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.444
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DPsL4nO25sRE for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pechora5.dc.icann.org (pechora5.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2830:201::1:71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4E93A1080 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pechora5.dc.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 649647000D4B; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9696A38BDB; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:56:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id D3amSCy27Qki; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:56:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A52C38BDA; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:56:48 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1649275008; bh=wjOVRSpD1jRcNWfsZBzrlgAaVDJtX3YP2h8v+QodGM8=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=t5Nx/Dl6MYa2lqz+sNNzK9naFWIzEHjoeCJaJBA3ylV7ZqyoaG2TB/D0PlqZfH+CP JgPdmDyTHcSmKNhyKFmznil8quGqQ0m8A0iDxcIxkCBmoz2j+7DiqWAmn0To3hsUkn EUIn8Ut80t8l8AnW9Zx31it2H4QMhJEtNxGoKuNTKsEwOyFTrI3SKk98+SAMXCgjNp 1SmyA85Vw+diOObEBA5E2dQdjlXb+Ufy58FVQ/M3N8Z/P62B+pls5M3OtyODu70vI3 b75802+XWILtIC7S6HZ7fxlK72Z9MoM9B8h7ser5fvGj0dasdQ5TFhNlVuOB9mp33N ekQN/GT7oAxzA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2876B585; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:45:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
cc: iana-prot-param@iana.org, tte@cs.fau.de, iana@iana.org, anima-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher@ietf.org, media-types@iana.org, hartke@projectcool.de
In-Reply-To: <5c055419-fc41-f3c1-e49b-fb6d501d49c9@isode.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1229076@icann.org> <YkXmpaK3PJbx+gom@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <BY5PR11MB419654B72E9A77C4BA5A0058B5E59@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <YkshoZfABsMcxr8b@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <rt-4.4.3-23751-1649103660-1864.1229076-37-0@icann.org> <YkxHOj/Jb6Z38+C6@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <rt-4.4.3-29483-1649166171-1519.1229076-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-29527-1649180404-759.1229076-37-0@icann.org> <5c055419-fc41-f3c1-e49b-fb6d501d49c9@isode.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 15:45:35 -0400
Message-ID: <10966.1649274335@localhost>
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (pechora5.dc.icann.org [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/ZfL-zyw6f-m3A55ksR1V0Mg29e4>
Subject: Re: [media-types] [IANA #1229076] IANA: early allocation requests (was: Re: Rob pls. approve: Re: Rob/Warren: Early allocation request for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher (according to RFC7120))
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 19:46:09 -0000

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
    > On 05/04/2022 18:40, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
    >> Hi Toerless,
    >>
    >> On Tue Apr 05 13:42:51 2022,tte@cs.fau.de  wrote:
    >>> Let me add the draft authors and the media-types mailing list.
    >>> The request explicitly asked for a non-provisional registration.
    >> I believe we need to check with the ART ADs (although I think Murray, who was a media type reviewer, is currently on vacation). I'll send a message to Francesca and include Alexey, who is a reviewer now and was an AD when this issue came up.
    >>
    >>> I plan to have this draft in WG last call this week, so i would
    >>> suggest to proceed on the request in a way that helps to accelerate
    >>> finishing up the draft but not add additional work for you (IANA) or
    >>> the approvers, authors and others. Going first into provisional
    >>> and then shortly thereafter permanent registry does off the top of
    >>> my hed look like such duplication of effort (i may be wrong).
    >> That's OK -- although there is an extra step, if an early allocation is going to be in place long enough to require renewal, the provisional track is actually a little easier for us (but not so much so that it's worth taking into account).

    > Section 5.2.1 of RFC 6838 specifies Provisional Registration procedure for
    > cases like this. I don't think it intended to allow for early allocation as
    > per RFC 7120.

    > As a media type expert I am happy to review this registration early to avoid
    > any surprises from Expert Reviewers.

Thank you!


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide