From iana-shared@icann.org  Mon Apr  1 17:06:25 2024
Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBC4C14F6E4
 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Apr 2024 17:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.924
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
 MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001,
 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id jh8KWrNcB6Z8 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon,  1 Apr 2024 17:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10F0C14F6AC
 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Apr 2024 17:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request6.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221])
 by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5FBE1BD9;
 Tue,  2 Apr 2024 00:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request6.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 405FB4B078; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 00:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-mime-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-mime-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-1451802-1711394506-1171.1360120-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1360120@icann.org>
 <B074B943-9762-4CB0-8739-68DD42526404@isode.com>
 <rt-5.0.3-357478-1710639749-1723.1360120-9-0@icann.org>
 <rt-5.0.3-1451802-1711394506-1171.1360120-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-465586-1712016381-1629.1360120-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1360120
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: media-types@ietf.org, alexey.melnikov@isode.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:06:21 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/bOHkjPLYtwCa0gE1e6IzQLcjUDQ>
Subject: [media-types] [IANA #1360120] application/vnd.msgpack registration
 request
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type,
 Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>,
 <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>,
 <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:06:25 -0000

Hi Alexey,

Sending a reminder for this response from March 25th.

thanks,
Amanda

On Mon Mar 25 19:21:46 2024, amanda.baber wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> We have fragment identifier and change author/change controller
> responses from the applicant:
> 
> ===
> 
> 1) Fragment identifier +msgpack is considered to be used with other
> media types to define encoding like +json does (unless specified
> otherwise). So "Fragment identifier considerations" section could be
> something like this:
> 
> The syntax and semantics of fragment identifiers specified for
> +msgpack
> should be as specified for "application/vnd.msgpack"
> 
> 2) I'm a contributor of MessagePack project, who wanted to resolve the
> issue of widespread use of deprecated media types. As the original
> MessagePack specification author Sadayuki Furuhashi is inactive for a
> while, I don't want to bother him by publishing his contacts. I would
> like to include them without that if it's appropriate.
> 
> ===
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Sun Mar 17 01:42:29 2024, alexey.melnikov@isode.com wrote:
> > Hi Amanda,
> >
> > Sorry for the slow response.
> >
> > This is mostly fine, but I have a small question and a bigger concern
> > expressed below.
> >
> >
> > On 01/03/2024 18:14, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > > Can you review this registration request by March 15th?
> >
> > > This was originally submitted as a request for standards-tree
> > > registration, but the submitter isn't affiliated with a standards
> > > organization and has yet to write an I-D.
> >
> > > He writes, "I would like to edit the registration template to make
> > > it
> > > a vendor-tree ('application/vnd.msgpack') registration request, as
> > > writing RFC would take some considerable time (but pretty much aim
> > > to
> > > do that anyway)."
> >
> > > thanks,
> > > Amanda
> >
> > > ===
> >
> > > Name: Alexander Ivanov
> >
> > > Email: saiv46.dev+iana@gmail.com
> >
> > > Media type name: application
> >
> > > Media subtype name: vnd.msgpack
> >
> > > Required parameters: N/A.
> >
> > > Optional parameters: N/A.
> >
> > > Encoding considerations: binary
> >
> > > Security considerations: This media type does not enforce a
> > > security
> > > mechanism, as it does not contain any executable content. The
> > > format
> > > specification does not provide any encryption or integrity checks,
> > > so
> > > appropriate mechanisms must be implemented at the application or
> > > transport level. The format allows applications to define
> > > application-specific types, so security considerations of such
> > > extensions cannot be assessed.
> >
> > > Interoperability considerations: The specification explicitly
> > > defines
> > > a way to encode information (relying on standards such as IEEE
> > > 754),
> > > as well as limitations to allow conversion to and from other
> > > encodings (such as JSON). This provides interoperability not just
> > > between implementations, applications and hardware, but media types
> > > as well.
> >
> > > Published specification:
> > > https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack/blob/master/spec.md
> > > https://msgpack.org/
> >
> > > Applications which use this media: MessagePack has been used to
> > > exchange arbitrary data between applications written in various
> > > programming languages and environments, replacing existing media
> > > types such as JSON.
> >
> > > Fragment identifier considerations: +msgpack
> >
> > I am not clear on what this means.
> >
> > > Restrictions on usage: N/A.
> >
> > > Provisional registration? (standards tree only): No
> >
> > > Additional information:
> >
> > > 1. Deprecated alias names for this type: application/x+msgpack
> > > 2. Magic number(s): N/A.
> > > 3. File extension(s): N/A.
> > > 4. Macintosh file type code: N/A.
> > > 5. Object Identifiers: N/A.
> >
> > > General Comments:
> >
> > > Person to contact for further information:
> >
> > > 1. Name: Alexander Ivanov
> > > 2. Email: saiv46.dev+msgpack@gmail.com
> >
> > > Intended usage: COMMON
> >
> > > Author/Change controller: Alexander Ivanov
> > > <saiv46.dev+msgpack@gmail.com>
> >
> > It is not clear to me how Alexander is related to the project, as the
> > original
> > creator of MessagePack is a different person. Can you please ask?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Alexey

