IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [media-types] Review requested for draft-bormann-cbor-04

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 19 July 2013 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C037311E80FC for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBK0rYgWj4tD for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D7011E80E1 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-228.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6JGi9so048270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:44:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-228.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.228] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <51E969E2.3040105@att.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:44:09 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1335C6B8-2E6E-494F-8424-8DCE8A8F19DC@vpnc.org>
References: <6B5DD251-B033-420E-8BFF-51784EDE6E29@vpnc.org> <88736767-FD9F-48A0-955F-92FFAD3B0319@vpnc.org> <51E969E2.3040105@att.com>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:16:06 -0700
Cc: media-types@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [media-types] Review requested for draft-bormann-cbor-04
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/media-types>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:44:15 -0000

On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> wrote:

> On 7/19/2013 11:44 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> 
>>> Making Carsten Bormann the change controller requires some rationale,
>>> including where RFC 6838 allows that, especially considering that the
>>> draft-bormann-cbor-04 document appears to be "Standards Track".
>> I see nothing in RFC 6838 that suggests anything other than what we put in. Having said that, if this group wants standards-track documents to begin having change control be with the IESG, we would certainly make that change *as long as* you say exactly what should be in the field. If that's what y'all want, someone here should write up a short update to 6838 saying so.
> 
> I think anything on the standards track almost always has the IESG
> listed as the change controller.

Ah, maybe that's newer than what I have seen. Can you point to a recent RFC with that so we can copy it into our template?

And, again, maybe an update to (the recently-issued) RFC 6838 is in order for this.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email