IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [media-types] WG: Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112

Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> Tue, 09 November 2021 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <chris@w3.org>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342DF3A1042 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:48:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mtMXDlk1zvYY for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from raoul.w3.org (raoul.w3.org [128.30.52.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA06F3A0A69 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppp-2-87-21-171.home.otenet.gr ([2.87.21.171] helo=[192.168.1.9]) by raoul.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <chris@w3.org>) id 1mkX6k-0008L4-9A for media-types@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:48:38 +0000
Message-ID: <50192421-ec0d-d571-cd0b-48c5ca306467@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 21:48:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/94.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: media-types@ietf.org
References: <c70cd535-127f-640f-99ec-8a8e517d7eca@alvestrand.no>
From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <c70cd535-127f-640f-99ec-8a8e517d7eca@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/jEVkYVv3tG3vb-shPOiA3a4FTDQ>
Subject: Re: [media-types] WG: Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:48:42 -0000

  I agree that there should be a process for creating a new top-level 
type. Rationale: I was the editor of RFC 8081 The "font" Top-Level Media 
Type.

On 2021-11-09 17:37, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Should there be a process for creating a new top level type

-- 
Chris Lilley
@svgeesus
Technical Director @ W3C
W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email