IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [media-types] [dispatch] Proposed/draft charter for "mediaman"

Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net> Wed, 30 June 2021 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@hoplahup.net>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F58F3A2B67 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7-R-H4s7yqa for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 18.mo3.mail-out.ovh.net (18.mo3.mail-out.ovh.net [87.98.172.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BEF73A2B11 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from player788.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.4.215]) by mo3.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F73828F978 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:09:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hoplahup.net (pd9526ca7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.82.108.167]) (Authenticated sender: paul@hoplahup.net) by player788.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 104CB1FC6642E; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:09:44 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-104R005dcda3571-b674-4f03-8161-b4a49b0bae03, DFFEAFC7B9EFBBCC258E3DC0D3CC50C9FA61C943) smtp.auth=paul@hoplahup.net
X-OVh-ClientIp: 217.82.108.167
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <paul@hoplahup.net>
To: "Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, media-types@ietf.org, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>, "Ned Freed" <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:09:36 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5757)
Message-ID: <4D858397-159F-42E9-B9BC-41457FF9E17E@hoplahup.net>
In-Reply-To: <2aefbe02-bf86-4689-a8d3-b6fd8149ed56@www.fastmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwavrxxa=fdn48-F8Dt2qBDFEJyPoNjSkYOiHi-46k1Wtw@mail.gmail.com> <01RYY5BDVHVK0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <5F193852-2CBE-4885-A7E9-14B377DFB5E2@mnot.net> <CAL0qLwZOvFqYtcXGV_bdHJ_PkUjJdGZJ+itoUxjF-4xYzgbDGQ@mail.gmail.com> <01RZSLCQGG9Y00IM2V@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAL0qLwZJ2nPaiFOWZf9SOPP3pAK5kmm8t1Xu7A36xiwJDd8_Jw@mail.gmail.com> <DD5C1199-9179-460C-B4F7-B26451EAF754@mnot.net> <CAL0qLwZeqdko+7+MtawzXe=BDys1LH=wzUdv+9ye4uSr7yNURA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY0AMORExhAT=Euzn6y2jWQmA9r4vSYCsymBj8_-fshuQ@mail.gmail.com> <F8EFFBD8-D8D4-439A-A6A7-0DBAD83FB939@hoplahup.net> <CAL0qLwamho3kpf1PAYMg77iTVohuUs-JQtz_fu3V7=4SAC5OVA@mail.gmail.com> <2aefbe02-bf86-4689-a8d3-b6fd8149ed56@www.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_B59B7529-626B-4183-BAED-6434B14C2844_="
Embedded-HTML: [{"plain":[110, 1815], "uuid":"DC6580B6-86B8-411E-9E8D-F021E5FB6341"}]
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15968919855018648805
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeeigedgieefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffoffkjghfgggtsegrtdhmreertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfgruhhlucfnihgssghrvggthhhtfdcuoehprghulheshhhophhlrghhuhhprdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekgfehieefueeghfeijefgfffhieehffeiveefhfefteegveekfeehgeeffefhheenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedtrddtrddtrddtpddvudejrdekvddruddtkedrudeijeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehplhgrhigvrhejkeekrdhhrgdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgruhhlsehhohhplhgrhhhuphdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehmvgguihgrqdhthihpvghssehivghtfhdrohhrgh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/k2GjXUUtKQ5cCdEePvgIWsUbD98>
Subject: Re: [media-types] [dispatch] Proposed/draft charter for "mediaman"
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:10:06 -0000

I am happy to help on this topic if this is feasible.
paul

On 30 Jun 2021, at 18:24, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021, at 11:36 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:00 PM Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net> 
>> wrote:
>>> __
>>> I am wondering if the group is the right place to prepare an update 
>>> of the registration template so as remove the Macintosh 
>>> 4-letter-codes and insert clipboard flavours for windows and 
>>> universal type identifiers for macOS.
>>>
>>> This was discussed a few times on this mailing list.
>>> I have been in contact with a few media-type proposers, some of 
>>> which have accepted a change of their declaration in this direction.
>>> I have been in contact with one IETF-aware person to update RFC6838 
>>> but that has not progressed.
>>>
>
> I am the guilty IETF-aware person...
>
> I am thinking that if we are doing all other related work we might as 
> well tackle this, so I am in support of doing this in the WG. Now 
> ideally I would like this to be addressed as an extension to the media 
> type registration template that list extra optional fields. So I don't 
> want to reopen RFC6838, but a separate draft that updates it would be 
> great.
>
>>
>> There's been no feedback from anyone else, up or down, about this 
>> idea.  My own impression is that this isn't quite within scope of 
>> what we're talking about for this effort, but then again it makes 
>> sense to include this now rather than spin up a subsequent effort or 
>> wait for the next train.  Naturally I'm happy to include this in the 
>> proposed charter if there's consensus to include it.
>>
>> I'm just about to enqueue the charter we have in hand for its first 
>> IESG review pass before it goes out for general review.  If this or 
>> any other change should be included in that submission, please 
>> (everyone, anyone) say something sooner rather than later.
> Hopefully it is not too late :-).
>
> Best Regards,
> Alexey

> _______________________________________________
> media-types mailing list
> media-types@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email