Re: [media-types] new media type proposed: draft-wilde-xml-patch-05

[Erik Wilde <[e-mail]>]

hello bjoern.

On 2013-08-22 07:53 , Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Erik Wilde wrote:
>> On 2013-08-22 02:26 , Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>>> * Erik Wilde wrote:
>>>>         Optional parameters: Same as charset parameter for the media type
>>>>         "application/xml" as specified in RFC 3023 [1].
>>> I think you need to rephrase that.
>> you're referring to the fact that the charset parameter should be first
>> listed, but then the sentence could remain the same, right? thanks for
>> spotting this!
> That would work, yes.
>>>>            File extension(s): XML documents should use ".xml" as the file
>>>>            extension.
>>> I do not think there is a consensus to that effect.
>> so just suggest ".xml" as a possibility without making that claim? until
>> now, there is no other extension to be proposed.
> That would work.

done and done in 
https://github.com/dret/I-D/blob/master/xml-patch/draft-wilde-xml-patch-06.xml; 
i will wait a little while for more feedback about the published version 
-05, and if there is none, i will soon publish -06 in this updated form.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:[e-mail]  -  tel:[phone] |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |