Re: [media-types] WG: Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112

[Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]>]

On 11/9/21 5:15 PM, Yeshwant Muthusamy wrote:
>
> Hi Harald,
>
> Thanks for chairing the session today. No opposition to the opinion polls.
>
> I do have some (newbie) questions on logistics, since the haptics v2 
> draft expires next week (Nov 15, 2021):
>
>  1. Do I wait for the consensus to be confirmed on this mailing list
>     before putting out the next version?
>
Yes.
>
> 1.
>
>
>  2. You referred to ‘republish as an IETF draft’ – does that mean that
>     it is OK to let v02 expire, since there is an IETF draft coming
>     soon (and not really v03 of the DISPATCH draft)?
>
When you submit the IETF draft (named 
draft-ietf-mediaman-something-something-00), you should be able to say 
on the submission form that this replaces 
draft-muthusamy-something-something. Then the old draft will 
automatically be marked obsolete in the trackers.

> 1.
>
>
>  2. I’d like to add the latest updates pertaining to MPEG ISOBMFF and
>     the W3C haptics prose to the draft to make it current. Is that
>     something I can do in this new IETF draft?
>

Good idea. Just do it.


> 1.
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yeshwant
>
> Yeshwant Muthusamy, Ph.D. | Vice President, Standards
>
> [e-mail] | [phone]
>
> www.immersion.com
>
> 330 Townsend St, Suite 234
>
> San Francisco, California 94107
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: media-types <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Harald 
> Alvestrand
> Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 9:38 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [media-types] WG: Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112
>
> The following opinion polls were taken at the IETF meeting of 
> MEDIAMAN, which translate directly into WG decisions if confirmed on 
> the mailing list.
>
> The questions asked, with hand raised / hand not raised numbers:
>
> - Should there be a process for creating a new top level type? (10:2)
>
> - Should we adopt the haptics draft? (14:0)
>
> - Should we adopt the suffixes draft? (10:0)
>
> If the list agrees with the consensus answers to this question, the 
> chair will:
>
> - Start work for writing up a process on how to create a new top level 
> type
>
> - Instruct the "haptics" authors to republish as an IETF draft
>
> - Instruct the "suffixes" authors to republish as an IETF draft
>
> If you wish to support or oppose any of these decisions, please reply 
> to this message explaining your position.
>
> Harald
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> media-types mailing list
>
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmedia-types&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd15515681b7048b04f2608d9a396f15a%7C4f05e41a59b8413aae19d5df3dfd0fb5%7C0%7C1%7C637720690972261401%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=HzqMA0OAAevLR9bQChE3ZY5NL61ADQJIs807zjiZ9pc%3D&amp;reserved=0 
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmedia-types&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd15515681b7048b04f2608d9a396f15a%7C4f05e41a59b8413aae19d5df3dfd0fb5%7C0%7C1%7C637720690972261401%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=HzqMA0OAAevLR9bQChE3ZY5NL61ADQJIs807zjiZ9pc%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>