[MEDIACTRL] No request for a Mediactrl session at Beijing IETF

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Tue, 28 September 2010 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643713A6C19 for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k0d-7Yp18TTg for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com (nj300815-nj-outbound.net.avaya.com [135.11.29.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2233A6B7E for <mediactrl@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,245,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="36594937"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 23:27:11 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,245,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="520582447"
Received: from dc-us1hcex1.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.20]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 23:27:10 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.129]) by DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com ([2002:870b:3414::870b:3414]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:27:10 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Burger Eric <eburger@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:27:09 -0400
Thread-Topic: No request for a Mediactrl session at Beijing IETF
Thread-Index: AQHLXrwnoTrRBo4Wr061qJtdZuGhkQ==
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79C69@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mediactrl@ietf.org" <mediactrl@ietf.org>
Subject: [MEDIACTRL] No request for a Mediactrl session at Beijing IETF
X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List <mediactrl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mediactrl>
List-Post: <mailto:mediactrl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:26:32 -0000

Given that no member of the Mediactrl working group has said that a session at Beijing would accelerate work, I [as a co-chair of Mediactrl] am not making any request for a session.

Members:  It is still possible to request a session through the exception process if we do so quickly.  If members explain that they think a session would be productive, please contact me or my co-chair Eric Burger ASAP.

My esteemed co-chair:  I haven't coordinated this very tightly with you; if you think a session would be useful, you or I can still make a request through an AD.

Dale