Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 1 - IVR Package

Both.

On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Victor Paulsamy wrote:

> Is it mandatory to support both or either?
> 
> --victor
> 
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:59 AM, McGlashan, Scott <scott.mcglashan@hp.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> As part of our IESG review of the IVR package the following issue has been identified:
> 
> 1) In Section 4:
> 
>   The MS MUST
>   support one or more schemes using communication protocols suitable
>   for fetching resources (e.g.  HTTP).
> 
> I don't think this is good enough for interoperability. You should specify a
> mandatory to implement protocol for fetching resources.
> I suggest you mandate
> use of HTTP and HTTPS. (The latter is important for providing data
> confidentiality)
> 
> The same issue is relevant in section 4.3.1.4 - a mandatory to implement
> protocol for recording data.
> 
> Are we happy to mandate the use of HTTP and HTTPS in the context of fetching dialog documents and resources as well as recordings?
> This seems a reasonable change to us but would affect implementations which don't already support these protocols. Let us know if you have any objections to this change.
> 
> thanks
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> MEDIACTRL mailing list
> MEDIACTRL@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl
> Supplemental Web Site:
> http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEDIACTRL mailing list
> MEDIACTRL@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl
> Supplemental Web Site:
> http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl

Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 1 - IVR Package - HTTP/HTTPS mandatory

Attachment: smime.p7s