Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 3 - IVR Package - <variable>/<variabletype> interoperability
Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com> Fri, 08 October 2010 11:09 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
X-Original-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19A33A6864 for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zlJ6ZbhVWymo for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtplq04.aruba.it (smtplq-out5.aruba.it [62.149.158.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9719A3A6841 for <mediactrl@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5623 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2010 11:10:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp6.aruba.it) (62.149.128.201) by smtplq04.aruba.it with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 11:10:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 19521 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2010 11:10:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lminiero-acer) (lorenzo@meetecho.com@143.225.229.172) by smtp6.ad.aruba.it with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 11:10:09 -0000
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:07:41 +0200
From: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
To: Victor Paulsamy <vpaulsamy@ditechnetworks.com>
Message-Id: <20101008130741.1b7a85ac.lorenzo@meetecho.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikUAn3L6sxs+O5dFrtPNOOUMeTxCRfw+0TcPSW3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C8D3601A.9394%Scott.McGlashan@hp.com> <AANLkTikUAn3L6sxs+O5dFrtPNOOUMeTxCRfw+0TcPSW3@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Meetecho
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: smtp6.ad.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: smtplq04.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N
Cc: "Alexey@core3.amsl.com" <Alexey@core3.amsl.com>, "mediactrl-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mediactrl-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mediactrl-ivr-control-package@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mediactrl-ivr-control-package@tools.ietf.org>, "mediactrl@ietf.org" <mediactrl@ietf.org>, "stpeter@stpeter.im" <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Subject: Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 3 - IVR Package - <variable>/<variabletype> interoperability
X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List <mediactrl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mediactrl>
List-Post: <mailto:mediactrl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:09:09 -0000
I agree, I think that's the best option. L. On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:14:10 +0700 Victor Paulsamy <vpaulsamy@ditechnetworks.com> wrote: > I like to see option # 2 as well. > > --victor > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:31 PM, McGlashan, Scott <scott.mcglashan@hp.com>wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > As part of our IESG review of the IVR package the following issues have > > been identified: > > > > (a) 4.3.1.1.1. <variable> > > > > A <variable> element has the following attributes: > > > > value: specifies the string to be rendered. A valid value is a > > string (see Section 4.6.6). The attribute is mandatory. > > > > type: specifies the type to use for rendering. A valid value is a > > string (see Section 4.6.6). The attribute is mandatory. > > > > format: specifies format information to use in conjunction with the > > type for the rendering. A valid value is a string (see > > Section 4.6.6). The attribute is optional. There is no default > > value. > > > > Are these defined somewhere in more details? > > > > For example, the MS could support <variable> type/format combinations > > such as: > > > > Is this the complete list? > > > > > > (b) Please clarify how implementations will achieve interoperability with > > regard to the <variable> element, given that there are no registries or > > specification for the 'type' and 'format' attributes. This applies also to > > the <variabletype> element. > > > > > > We need some input from the mailing list on how we should proceed with this > > one: some options > > > > 1. Strengthen our descriptions of date, time and digits format/types. Limit > > interoperability requirements to these 3 types. > > > > 2. As 1), but introduce registry for adding additional types. > > > > 3. Delete the <variable> and <variabletype> elements. > > > > > > I would like WG input on these options. My preference is for option 2 (or > > option 1 as 2nd choice). > > > > Thanks > > > > Scott > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MEDIACTRL mailing list > > MEDIACTRL@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl > > Supplemental Web Site: > > http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl > > > -- Lorenzo Miniero Meetecho s.r.l. http://www.meetecho.com
- [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 3 - IVR Package - <variable>/<v… McGlashan, Scott
- Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 3 - IVR Package - <variable… Victor Paulsamy
- Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 3 - IVR Package - <variable… Lorenzo Miniero