[MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 16 - Control Framework - Port

Chris Boulton <chris@ns-technologies.com> Wed, 04 August 2010 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <chris@ns-technologies.com>
X-Original-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DC33A6814 for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 05:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.298
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CkSIbKijqBYm for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 05:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.qbytedns.net (host.qbytedns.net []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8843A69CE for <mediactrl@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 05:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (port=50597 helo=[]) by host.qbytedns.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <chris@ns-technologies.com>) id 1OgdCv-0001ws-HT; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:36:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4C595EC5.8090707@ns-technologies.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:36:21 +0100
From: Chris Boulton <chris@ns-technologies.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv: Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mediactrl@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080708020903080202030705"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.qbytedns.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ns-technologies.com
Cc: draft-ietf-mediactrl-sip-control-framework@tools.ietf.org, mediactrl-chairs@tools.ietf.org, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
Subject: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 16 - Control Framework - Port
X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List <mediactrl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mediactrl>
List-Post: <mailto:mediactrl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:36:02 -0000

Hi All,

As part of our IESG review the following has been identified:

Also in Section 4.1: given that the use of the registered port is at

the SHOULD level, why cannot it be considered the "default" value?

Are we happy to make this a default value?  This would not change any 
existing client implementations, but will impact server implementations 
as new clients get deployed.


Chris Boulton
CTO & Co-founder
NS-Technologies <http://www.ns-technologies.com>
m: +44.7876.476681