Re: [MEDIACTRL] Do we need time in Beijing?

"McGlashan, Scott" <scott.mcglashan@hp.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.mcglashan@hp.com>
X-Original-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A403A6BB7 for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqx6Zx2WUSuQ for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com (g4t0015.houston.hp.com [15.201.24.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E0A3A6B6E for <mediactrl@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from G6W0641.americas.hpqcorp.net (g6w0641.atlanta.hp.com [16.230.34.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g4t0015.houston.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7033C87F6; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:30:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from G6W0644.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.230.34.80) by G6W0641.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.230.34.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:30:12 +0000
Received: from GVW1124EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.228.24.184]) by G6W0644.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.230.34.80]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:30:12 +0000
From: "McGlashan, Scott" <scott.mcglashan@hp.com>
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, "mediactrl@ietf.org" <mediactrl@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:29:15 +0000
Thread-Topic: [MEDIACTRL] Do we need time in Beijing?
Thread-Index: ActeYUHekniVIWf+S/C1R9UI0TgIdQ==
Message-ID: <C8C6920A.8AB1%Scott.McGlashan@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <42382B41-ADA2-4432-8A74-F7DA9441C0B8@standardstrack.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100802
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MEDIACTRL] Do we need time in Beijing?
X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List <mediactrl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mediactrl>
List-Post: <mailto:mediactrl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:30:12 -0000

Yes Sir!

I'll work to your 2 week deadline for the mixer and ivr packages - they
are in progress, so expect more questions to the mailing list over the
next few days.

I'll not be in Beijing unfortunately, but can attend remotely.

Scott


On 26/09/2010 04:19, "Eric Burger" <eburger@standardstrack.com> wrote:

>Let's put it another way: we are very close to being finished.
>
>If I was a jerk, I would say, "If the documents are not done in the next
>two weeks, we meet, and whoever shows up gets to be the editor and get
>attribution for the work."
>
>Of course, I am not a jerk.
>
>Well, I can be.
>
>Let's get this done!
>
>BTW, I will be in Beijing, so no issue for me...
>
>On Sep 25, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
>> 
>> [as chair]
>> 
>> Do we need a session in Beijing?  The deadline for requesting a session
>>is upon us (Monday).
>> 
>> The Datatracker says that we have several finished RFCs, one draft in
>>IESG evaluation (which we've been seeing progress on), two that the IESG
>>thinks need work, and two drafts that "exist".  My sense is that author
>>bandwidth is the limiting resource at the moment.
>> 
>> The only one draft has been updated since Maastricht and only two since
>>Anaheim.
>> 
>> Will a session in Beijing help move things along?
>> 
>> Dale