Re: [MEDIACTRL] Do we need time in Beijing?

Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com> Sun, 26 September 2010 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
X-Original-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mediactrl@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E833A6A6A for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R6PPDB4RtbOW for <mediactrl@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtplq03.aruba.it (smtplq-out14.aruba.it [62.149.158.34]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 903BB3A6A0E for <mediactrl@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10361 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2010 09:22:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp5.aruba.it) (62.149.128.201) by smtplq03.aruba.it with SMTP; 26 Sep 2010 09:22:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 32118 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2010 09:22:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rainmak3r.no-ip.info) (lorenzo@meetecho.com@79.40.57.148) by smtp5.ad.aruba.it with SMTP; 26 Sep 2010 09:22:41 -0000
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:22:38 +0200
From: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Message-Id: <20100926112238.4c2016d8.lorenzo@meetecho.com>
In-Reply-To: <42382B41-ADA2-4432-8A74-F7DA9441C0B8@standardstrack.com>
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79C68@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <42382B41-ADA2-4432-8A74-F7DA9441C0B8@standardstrack.com>
Organization: Meetecho
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: smtp5.ad.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: smtplq03.aruba.it 1.6.2 0/1000/N
Cc: mediactrl@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEDIACTRL] Do we need time in Beijing?
X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List <mediactrl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mediactrl>
List-Post: <mailto:mediactrl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:22:10 -0000

I will not be in Beijing, but I've not abandoned the WG. I'm one of the authors of the two drafts that "exist", and I'm following the evolution of the drafts currently under evaluation by the IESG, since both of the drafts depend on them (especially on the framework).

If anyone can start reviewing the call flows and check the MRB for the remaining nits/mistakes, that would be great.

L.


On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:19:30 -0400
Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> wrote:

> Let's put it another way: we are very close to being finished.
> 
> If I was a jerk, I would say, "If the documents are not done in the next two weeks, we meet, and whoever shows up gets to be the editor and get attribution for the work."
> 
> Of course, I am not a jerk.
> 
> Well, I can be.
> 
> Let's get this done!
> 
> BTW, I will be in Beijing, so no issue for me...
> 
> On Sep 25, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
> > 
> > [as chair]
> > 
> > Do we need a session in Beijing?  The deadline for requesting a session is upon us (Monday).
> > 
> > The Datatracker says that we have several finished RFCs, one draft in IESG evaluation (which we've been seeing progress on), two that the IESG thinks need work, and two drafts that "exist".  My sense is that author bandwidth is the limiting resource at the moment.
> > 
> > The only one draft has been updated since Maastricht and only two since Anaheim.
> > 
> > Will a session in Beijing help move things along?
> > 
> > Dale


-- 
Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>