Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81
Ashutosh Dutta <ashutosh.dutta@ieee.org> Thu, 07 July 2011 01:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ashutosh.dutta@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3521821F86E9 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7+-Be1MohIg for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7244821F86E1 for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from akee.cc.columbia.edu (akee.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.28.102]) by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p67125K5002591 for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from akee.cc.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by akee.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p67125ld027407 for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:02:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from www@localhost) by akee.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.13.0/Submit) id p67125ru027406 for mext@ietf.org; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:02:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 173-161-151-17-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net (173-161-151-17-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.161.151.17]) by cubmail.cc.columbia.edu (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:02:05 -0400
Message-ID: <20110706210205.qmfm4plq8w0w0ks8@cubmail.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:02:05 -0400
From: Ashutosh Dutta <ashutosh.dutta@ieee.org>
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com> <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CAE_dhju9phhpBdyUwUgGK576DTJKyM9BbsLV-cYyHd+RwNRvvw@mail.gmail.com> <4E142285.4080400@kddilabs.jp> <CAE_dhjvEzGgpn_e1rVp-8bjVDrXaGQtdo1doyid7nNkDpoQnJA@mail.gmail.com> <4E14FD81.4040002@kddilabs.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4E14FD81.4040002@kddilabs.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6)
X-CubMail-Sender: ad37@columbia.edu
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:02:10 -0000
Hi Julien, I agree with Yokota-san that face-to-face discussion helps a lot to avoid confusion and clarify the technical details. We should encourage face-to-face discussion as much as possible for the technical details. Regards Ashutosh Quoting Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>: > Hi Julien, > > WG mailing list sometimes leads to a lengthy discussion, which creates > misunderstandings and frustration that could be avoided if it was > discussed in a F2F meeting. Urgency is one important aspect but mutual > understanding is another good aspect of F2F meeting. It is pity to miss > such a precious opportunity for nothing in spite of a couple of very > interesting I-Ds awaiting a good discussion... > > -- > Hidetoshi > > (2011/07/06 23:31), Julien Laganier wrote: >> Hidetoshi, >> >> If WG mailing list on a given topic doesn' t happen in a timely >> fashion, I would suggest that either people are not interested in the >> topic, or it's not urgent to them. If a topic isn't urgent for >> people, then IMHO giving them face-to-face time isn't urgent either. >> >> --julien >> >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Hidetoshi Yokota<yokota@kddilabs.jp> wrote: >>> Hi Julien, >>> >>> WG mailing list is the base of the discussion, but sometimes it takes very >>> long time to proceed, by which it loses timeliness. Network-initiated flow >>> mobility or Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) come from urgent >>> needs and >>> IETF has the reputation of responding to such needs in a timely manner. F2F >>> meeting is generally more efficient than ML discussion and >>> effective for the >>> chairs to progress the standards process. I believe that ML discussion and >>> F2F meeting are the two wheels of moving I-Ds forward and we shouldn't miss >>> the opportunity of F2F meetings, which happen only three times in a year. >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Hidetoshi >>> >>> (2011/07/06 0:29), Julien Laganier wrote: >>>> >>>> Dirk and Hidetoshi, >>>> >>>> Face to face meeting time should IMHO primarily be used to resolve >>>> issues that cannot be resolved on the WG mailing list. As of now I do >>>> not see any, hence the absence of a MEXT WG meeting. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> --julien >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:09 AM,<Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need >>>>> more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and >>>>> potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list. >>>>> Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> Dirk >>>>> >>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>>> Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von >>>>> Hidetoshi Yokota >>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12 >>>>> An: mext@ietf.org >>>>> Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 >>>>> >>>>> Hi Julien and all, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of >>>>> "Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to >>>>> discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got >>>>> consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting >>>>> will be needed. >>>>> >>>>> Please take a look at the following I-D: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance for your support, >>>>> -- >>>>> Hidetoshi >>>>> >>>>> (2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require >>>>>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec. >>>>>> >>>>>> --julien& marcelo >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> MEXT mailing list >>>>>> MEXT@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> MEXT mailing list >>>>> MEXT@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dmm mailing list >>>>> dmm@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > MEXT mailing list > MEXT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
- [MEXT] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Ashutosh Dutta
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Thierry Ernst
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Julien Laganier