Re: [MEXT] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 13 September 2011 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ECD21F8B2B for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onPQmq6rH8kP for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D8C21F8BA2 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so621651wwf.13 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c5FGHIRU8JyakAdbArkqSJznGWv4lgncNdt2M4qARZA=; b=CbQNEZk5F+Kp8qYKNQR8krecBx6Dl9Uhjq8VRIoPX3SiCcX9bzr0aq3IeHBT2WMXCE p2d6SFmW/qzke5rjsQIqPijmsJhPuJl09eDdb7HVbQxeHqZbKuxwjiWNXSd4crm7N7iD UmxRJnJuNZ1Z9C9JoCRmeu2ILFxAc55wDB0mM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.151.200 with SMTP id d8mr3513704wbw.29.1315928130405; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.27.141 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA94DCD6.109C6%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
References: <CAE_dhjvMZ+GijvRA4=F526H3HbJCHMiwBOOMoMorLyeNUFOa6A@mail.gmail.com> <CA94DCD6.109C6%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:35:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE_dhjt_bOj=but86a7ML1OaEH+P6yHuh8BHCGO9233KM-u2iw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:33:30 -0000

Looks good. Thanks, Raj.

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:12 AM,  <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Fair enough. We will modify the statements in the I-D. Proposals below:
>
> On 9/13/11 9:29 AM, "ext Julien Laganier" <julien.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I don' t think either of these statements are appropriate:
>>
>>- "The IPsec/IKEv2 based security architectures makes implementation
>>and deployment of the protocol infeasible for numerous reasons."
>>
>>It has been implemented, thus it is factually incorrect to state that
>>implementation is infeasible.
>
> Just delete this statement.
>
>>
>>- "This document updates RFC 6275 and proposes an alternate security
>>framework."
>>
>>No, it does not. This document is not on the standard track.
>
> This document proposes an alternate security framework for Mobile IPv6 and
> Dual-stack Mobile IPv6.
>
> -Raj
>
>>
>>--julien
>>
>>On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:22 AM,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>directories. This draft is a work item of the Mobility EXTensions for
>>>IPv6 Working Group of the IETF.
>>>
>>>        Title           : Transport Layer Security-based Mobile IPv6
>>>Security Framework for Mobile Node to Home Agent Communication
>>>        Author(s)       : Jouni Korhonen
>>>                          Basavaraj Patil
>>>                          Hannes Tschofenig
>>>                          Dirk Kroeselberg
>>>        Filename        : draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>>        Pages           : 38
>>>        Date            : 2011-09-13
>>>
>>>   RFC 6275 Mobile IPv6 signaling between the mobile node and home agent
>>>   is secured using IPsec.  The security association between a mobile
>>>   node and the home agent is established using IKEv1 or IKEv2.  The
>>>   security model specified for Mobile IPv6, which relies on IKE/IPsec,
>>>   requires interaction between the Mobile IPv6 protocol part of the IP
>>>   stack and the IKE/IPsec part of the IP stack.  The IPsec/IKEv2 based
>>>   security architectures makes implementation and deployment of the
>>>   protocol infeasible for numerous reasons.  This document updates RFC
>>>   6275 and proposes an alternate security framework, which relies on
>>>   Transport Layer Security for establishing keying material and other
>>>   bootstrapping parameters required to protect Mobile IPv6 signaling
>>>   and data traffic between the mobile node and home agent.
>>>
>>>
>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>MEXT mailing list
>>MEXT@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
>