Re: [MEXT] Mobile IPv6 label and Mobile IPv6 protocol changes

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 22 March 2011 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F3B3A6808 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.303
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.303 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.296, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t-OuDZO8BjqL for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1773A6803 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so7453527fxm.31 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/eT8/Xx3bInOtJUA9p4kBd0Bev5L1uvyzcBm0cYzDxY=; b=wvUI/UskpWRNvrJxPXGX6Nx0x02fVTF8ESq6utI8KTGGKM/MQBEBkwr82f9U3M2Zlf g2yeXvwEK1tYdVW7jMSv6GGsH0Nu36SyX1nxLkvL5T+UVUy8Gnv+olt6q83RvV+gsMLr FR5ltf+wm1/xFbBxFSP/9O8M144ZKkfsBADEQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eAUxCjwgVtKSaTJM5B0Zklp7AKesy0dBgdt+trNU0Axk6vept2zY6x3psxo01/I1kg KTguXNXzEH1+Z/59dObKf0QOrawH4tJlvUDVQ7wCbgJiSM9hWmW6l+OtjNoJJZB383Rs GCijqKtLwfbGUkowv2m/M71ijRepwzpExRLC8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.59.146 with SMTP id l18mr5485710fah.58.1300832815987; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.78.135 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4D890BD4.8060502@gmail.com>
References: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C69021B3A@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4D7E64EE.5030302@it.uc3m.es> <4D860B93.4030602@gmail.com> <4D88ACE6.6030207@it.uc3m.es> <4D88B3A5.7050302@gmail.com> <4D88B7B5.4020903@it.uc3m.es> <4D88C23B.4020709@gmail.com> <4D88D22D.300@it.uc3m.es> <4D88FC52.4090309@gmail.com> <AANLkTimP84zss62OuTddFGLgDd5GAw1M7ctZh+Nxbkmj@mail.gmail.com> <4D890BD4.8060502@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:26:55 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim_wYf+=OsgzOTpm5wWz+sPi564Tpph0HpY57XW@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: mext <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Mobile IPv6 label and Mobile IPv6 protocol changes
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:25:24 -0000

Alex:

Let me get this straight:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
<alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 22/03/2011 21:28, Julien Laganier a écrit :
>>
>> Alex:
>>
>> What is your point? You're not happy with the agenda? Please be
>> specific.
>
> Because I earlier requested in private to Chairs a 5min slot in the
> agenda and I did not receive reply, neither + nor -.
>
> I guess(?) the reason of no reply may be similar to what was replied
> publicly to Fred's request, hence my dissertation.  I may be wrong though.
>
> Now publicly I would like to request a 5min slot to present advancement
> of draft-petrescu-autoconf-ra-based-routing-01.txt
> which presents three new scenarios applicable to Vehicular
> communications which use RA-based routing on Mobile Routers which may be
> HA-less when no HA available, and run unmodified Mobile IPv6 when HA
> available.

Couple of points:

1. Your draft also doesn't correspond to any of this WG's deliverable.

2. If I am not mistaken you were already given a chance to present
this draft in a MEXT session, at which point nobody in the WG
expressed interest in it.

3. I also have double-checked my mailbox and I do not see any private
request to the chairs for a five minute slot to present this draft.
The only related thing I can see is a message _to the list_ announcing
a new version of your draft which isn't replying to Marcelo's call for
slot request. In this message you wrote "if deemed necessary, I would
be happy to present during a 5minute slot at the MEXT WG meeting in
Prague." Since nobody replied to you, I am assuming that nobody on
this list deemed necessary that you present again this draft in
Prague.

As a result, I am denying your request for a slot.

--julien