[MEXT] Minutes and presentations from the "alt-mext" discussion group at IETF 81
"Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> Thu, 04 August 2011 22:47 UTC
Return-Path: <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id AA2B821F8556 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVa38qhYJ6Ec for
<mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net
(elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDBF21F8546 for <mext@ietf.org>;
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
b=gMDB9RTPP9TVDXyzKtIZy1/CJyVqEVuiJXbGbAuTR37rMoXRKtL7WIpuIGWdEnJK;
h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [138.111.58.2] (helo=[172.17.96.56]) by
elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim
4.67) (envelope-from <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>) id 1Qp6hj-00074o-LA for
mext@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:47:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4E3B2194.9030309@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:47:48 -0700
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Organization: Wichorus Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext <mext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956d5d4673fe7faad86b4d4d3b1c61d8850b3789d94bd508267350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 138.111.58.2
Subject: [MEXT] Minutes and presentations from the "alt-mext" discussion group
at IETF 81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:47:38 -0000
Hello folks, We had a lively discussion at an ad-hoc meeting for people interesting in discussion DMM and other [mext]-related topics at the IETF. I have collected together the materials at the following website: http://www.psg.com/~charliep/txt/ietf81/alt_mext/ Here are some minutes, collected from Alex and Dirk [thanks!]. One important procedural detail from the meeting bears repetition. It was stated that the reason we did not have a scheduled meeting of the [mext] WG at IETF 81, was because there was not much discussion on the mailing list. Some of the discussion had instead gone to the old DMM mailing list. I recommended that we shut down the DMM mailing list, because anything related to DMM ought to be discussed on the main [mext] mailing list now that DMM is on our charter. No one objected to my recommendation. Is there anyone on the [mext] mailing list who would object if the DMM mailing list were to be shut down? For all other comments, please direct discussion to this mailing list. Regards, Charlie P.
- [MEXT] Minutes and presentations from the "alt-me… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] Minutes and presentations from the "al… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] Minutes and presentations from the "al… Julien Laganier