Re: [MEXT] draft-kuntz-dmm-summary-00

> 
> Hi,
> 
> DMA is a generic concept of distribution of mobility anchors and  dynamic 
>activation of mobility signalling. It is illustrated with PMIP but can  also be 
>applied to MIP/FMIP. I agree it should be clarified with a specific  DMA-mip 
>draft...
> 

Don't get me wrong. I did not say it is not interesting, I said it might not 
interest Mext people.

I think that PMIP DMM could interest Mobopts. The chairs said non-MIP solutions 
are in their scope.

Regards,

Behcet
> Pierrick
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> >  De : mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] De la part  de
> > Behcet Sarikaya
> > Envoyé : mardi 5 juillet 2011 23:42
> >  À : Romain KUNTZ
> > Cc : mext@ietf.org
> > Objet : [MEXT]  draft-kuntz-dmm-summary-00
> > 
> > Hi Romain,
> >   A quick  review of your draft.
> > On HMIPv6, I agree with your observations.
> >  I think that DMA and DLMA are PMIPv6 dmm solutions and so maybe not so
> >  interesting for Mext.
> > ON DMI,it is a little archaic and also does not  address all issues of DMM.
> > It
> > just gives some good ideas, I  think.
> > 
> > You mentioned separation of control and data planes  which is from
> > yokota-dmm-scenario. This is a tough requirement to  satisfy within MIPv6
> > domain.
> > I think that one more requirement  of no extensions to MIPv6 has been
> > mentioned
> > in Beijing meeting.  So the drafts can be measured on how close they come
> > to this
> >  requirement.
> > 
> > Lastly, you have not covered newer drafts like  draft-sarikaya-mext-
> > multicastdmm.
> > 
> > It would be more  productive to review the dmm solution drafts on mext list,
> > as
> >  Julien mentioned.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Behcet
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MEXT mailing  list
> > MEXT@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> 