Re: [MEXT] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6276 (3078)

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 05 January 2012 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2BD21F87ED for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:51:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hwrHkOHY6Gr7 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84B621F8864 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:51:24 -0800 (PST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EA075A630; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:51:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1325789481.3890.63.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:51:21 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4F059DAF.6060407@gmail.com>
References: <20120105102405.4BFA8B1E003@rfc-editor.org> <4F059DAF.6060407@gmail.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-YGLxMeXfHiODGIvi+xr0"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3-3
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.8.0.1017-18628.000
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6276 (3078)
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:51:29 -0000

Hi all,

I also agree, and you can blame me for not noticing it... :(

Carlos

On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 13:55 +0100, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> I agree with this Errata : the HA is always at home and the figure title
> should say "Signaling sequence for the case the Mobile Router is at
> home" (and not HA at home).
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 05/01/2012 11:24, RFC Errata System a écrit :
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6276,
> > "DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6276&eid=3078
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: Sofiane IMADALI<sofiane.imadali@cea.fr>;
> >
> > Section: 3.2
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the home agent is at home
> >
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the Mobile Router is at home
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > The figure name is not corresponding to the section's name. In addition, the home agent is always at home.
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC6276 (draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-07)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)
> > Publication Date    : July 2011
> > Author(s)           : R. Droms, P. Thubert, F. Dupont, W. Haddad, C. Bernardos
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6
> > Area                : Internet
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> > _______________________________________________
> > MEXT mailing list
> > MEXT@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

-- 
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano  http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67