IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] IETF-80 meeting minutes posted / clarifications on draft-liu-mext-distributed-mobile-ip

Romain KUNTZ <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com> Thu, 21 April 2011 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54671E07D7 for <mext@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dOKPRaEnkE7I for <mext@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.75]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C09BEE07C5 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f48.google.com ([209.85.210.48]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob105.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTbBhtFsN1s+JJ78ghU5XwxQ8MYSUJdWm@postini.com; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:20 PDT
Received: by mail-pz0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 10so1233745pzk.7 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.33.137 with SMTP id r9mr253229pbi.101.1303404979921; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orii-lt2.paloalto.toyota-itc.com ([206.132.173.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6sm1414181pbi.64.2011.04.21.09.56.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Romain KUNTZ <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DAFD81A.8060307@go6.si>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:56:15 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <98550E8B-9F06-4719-981C-D6D5FD11FCB8@us.toyota-itc.com>
References: <BANLkTimN4Czxq-g8ZGo+zUysNFxrBDGi6g@mail.gmail.com> <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C46201A55BA2@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4DAFD81A.8060307@go6.si>
To: "Jan Zorz"@go6.si
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] IETF-80 meeting minutes posted / clarifications on draft-liu-mext-distributed-mobile-ip
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:56:22 -0000

Hello Jan,

On Apr 21, 2011, at 0:09, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
> From my point of view and how we are deploying mobility here it is desirable (or for our case mandatory) for MN to use only one stable HoA at all times, not many of them. At the same time it would be very nice to have multiple HAs, so you could connect to nearest one and optimize the path.
> 
> My thought was to anycast HA address where MN connects and deal with HoA advertising on network side with dynamic routing protocols.

You may have a look at Global HAHA:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wakikawa-mext-global-haha-spec-01

Regards,
romain

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email