Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication/etc. inwirelessnetworks
Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 August 2011 20:23 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id A87D921F8C09 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5JkWSI9mAhGI for
<mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com
[74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0190E21F8BE5 for
<mext@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg8 with SMTP id 8so3117614wyg.31 for <mext@ietf.org>;
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type; bh=9/gs+FnGPMZjce/lpqVInD7v3agWy0rVjbZXysplLO4=;
b=aV2mPLaibM3w1aCYMxDLFqf95Vj7Q1oaNwZHgNHZZIOz79ChQKOgx3njtk+f8E5Ag6
cXbhsRi34lDVtaiINsodWpX3GHUYBEcGE0wrC8UUM8C14SICI771k+DqrE76P9irkAsg
E5cs+KvHPZIh976syq5WCRureMxHMZEZGRmXs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.13.130 with SMTP id c2mr1345701wba.6.1314390289469;
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.141.79 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E57FDF3.9040904@computer.org>
References: <4E57E814.4020607@computer.org>
<CA7D5704.FADF%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
<CAE_dhjvEBg+AH5cLazfeQRxBwj7Njenp_rFoLZ9Uw=Zs7WyO1Q@mail.gmail.com>
<4E57FDF3.9040904@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:24:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE_dhjuqmz2s1gaU0Tub-vm0XVigw-Psb+W6D-gBHnzeLj4EEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: charliep@computer.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication/etc.
inwirelessnetworks
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:23:33 -0000
Hello Charlie, On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Charles E. Perkins <charliep@computer.org> wrote: > Hello Julien, > > > On 8/26/2011 1:00 PM, Julien Laganier wrote: > >> In the latter (handover between 3GPP and non-3GPP), given that the >> source and target system are accessed by different radio systems, I do >> not see handover performance has a factor hampering the usability or >> desirability of the inter-system handover scheme in use. > > It is definitely true that a handset with two different > radio interfaces, given proper infrastructure support and > software, can maintain excellent user experience as the > application session is maintained seamlessly while the handset > changes its care-of address to reflect its new point of > attachment to the Internet from a new radio interface. > > Is this what you meant? Yes. > But the way in which authentication is carried out during > handovers has a crucial impact on the handover performance. > Do you not agree? As above, I've been saying that Mobile IP handover performance does not seem to be a factor in how desirable it is for use in a 3GPP system. --julien
- [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication/etc… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Alper Yegin
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Alper Yegin
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Jong-Hyouk Lee
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication… Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] doubting a 3GPP MIP, because requires … Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem witha… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with … Pete McCann