IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 02 August 2011 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E968921F8877 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.375, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PF7Td1c2y5Yb for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A6721F8B54 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.2) with ESMTP id p72BS9L5029408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:28:09 +0200
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p72BS9oM025629; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:28:09 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [132.166.133.178] (is010183.intra.cea.fr [132.166.133.178]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id p72BS9bM014116; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:28:09 +0200
Message-ID: <4E37DF49.3050204@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:28:09 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <4E36F052.8050107@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E36F052.8050107@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:28:05 -0000

Le 01/08/2011 20:28, Charles E. Perkins a écrit :
>
> Hello folks,
>
> At IETF 81, LISP for mobile devices was presented.

In Mobopts?

Alex

> While I am not yet convinced about the specific
> solution presented, I started to look at LISP as
> a possible component of an overall DMM solution.
>
> LISP has a website:
> http://www.lisp4.net
>
> For people who are unfamiliar, this issue of IPJ
> has a tutorial article about LISP:
> http://www.lisp4.net/docs/ipj_11-1.pdf
>
> The LISP draft for mobile nodes is accessible here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyer-lisp-mn/
>
> Comments? I think that LISP should be added to the
> comparison matrix in my draft with Dapeng Liu.
> Would that be helpful?
>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email