Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work

Hello folks,

I'd also like to be involved with the effort.

I have two questions:

- Does route optimization have a role to play?
   It certainly can serve the purpose of distributing
   traffic optimally...

- What about a sort of "hierarchical PMIP"?

Regards,
Charlie P.

On 3/2/2011 7:17 PM, liu dapeng wrote:
> Hi Behcet,
>
>
> 2011/2/19, Behcet Sarikaya<behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>om>:
>> Hi Dapeng,
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hello Julien,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the information. But my question is: since the  charter is
>>> extended to "work on operational considerations on setting up  Mobile
>>> IPv6 networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way".  Does
>>> it mean that the extended charter include  problem/gap/scenario
>>> analysis of distributing the mobility anchor  (DMM)?
>>>
>>> I remember it seem that people agreed to do the analysis work of  DMM
>>> as the first step in Beijing meeting?
>>
>> My understanding is that the new informational document will be inline with
>> Julien's presentation he had in Beijing mext additional session we had on
>> dmm
>> and explain how MIPv6 as defined currently can be used to distribute the
>> traffic
>> in an optimal way.
>>
>> I suggest that you take the lead in this effort.
>
> ==>
>
> I think DMM barbof contributors have already done some work in this
> area. So if people agree I would like to organize writing this draft.
> Anyone who is interested
> to join the design team could reply this mail to let me know. thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Dapeng Liu
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Behcet
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>