IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81

Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp> Fri, 08 July 2011 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBD121F8A8E for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cftlRuDcGgeW for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:12::16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C3821F877E for <mext@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14957174822F for <mext@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:56:04 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnmS6pzKddT4 for <mext@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:56:03 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp [172.19.90.145]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C541748228 for <mext@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:56:03 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [10.8.0.6]) by ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB29A1B9B4 for <mext@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:55:02 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <4E17990F.6030805@kddilabs.jp>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:55:59 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com> <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CAE_dhju9phhpBdyUwUgGK576DTJKyM9BbsLV-cYyHd+RwNRvvw@mail.gmail.com> <4E142285.4080400@kddilabs.jp> <CAE_dhjvEzGgpn_e1rVp-8bjVDrXaGQtdo1doyid7nNkDpoQnJA@mail.gmail.com> <4E14FD81.4040002@kddilabs.jp> <4E154F24.3090600@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <4E154F24.3090600@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:56:12 -0000

Hi Marcelo,

Since the agenda for IETF 81 has been fixed and the MEXT WG is not
scheduled there, it won't mean much whatever I say. My comment was
intended to describe the importance of a F2F meeting. I'll try to
encourage the discussion on the ML.

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2011/07/07 15:16), marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> below...
> 
> El 07/07/11 02:27, Hidetoshi Yokota escribió:
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> WG mailing list sometimes leads to a lengthy discussion, which creates 
>> misunderstandings and frustration that could be avoided if it was 
>> discussed in a F2F meeting.
> i agree
> please point out the lenghty discussion that ocurred in the mext ml 
> since the last IETF meeting that deserves f2f time to clarify the 
> misunderstanding that were generated.
> 
> 
>> Urgency is one important aspect but mutual understanding is another 
>> good aspect of F2F meeting. It is pity to miss such a precious 
>> opportunity for nothing in spite of a couple of very interesting I-Ds 
>> awaiting a good discussion...
>>
> Right, but having a meeting to discuss issues that people not care 
> enough to even comment in the ml, seems like a waste of time
> 
> Regards, marcelo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email