IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 12 July 2011 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EE711E8412 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cnlQQfDH4w91 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2B511E83FE for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwb17 with SMTP id 17so4300104bwb.31 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=X8BvCjRKF0t0uXqitUNa7zpXpsfl3v3gL4VQSwja7bM=; b=XdvkQVlTHiiM7HXmruYHbcqV1h2Luc0Yskp8IJ5R1IZhtz4HrqI9qbmvQvYxtaLkZ4 TghETc+YA7Z+ULuEddcces+f6DRx/5lVPHJB7zLQSpw3VwcWhkNVTKrdJEotC0R/L/0L 0v4kybADCxP91Ms4btaiIJaf46/oZIdddfQPo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.127.156 with SMTP id g28mr2864331bks.114.1310436102496; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.62.77 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1310421584.56031.YahooMailRC@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com> <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CAE_dhju9phhpBdyUwUgGK576DTJKyM9BbsLV-cYyHd+RwNRvvw@mail.gmail.com> <4E142285.4080400@kddilabs.jp> <CAE_dhjvEzGgpn_e1rVp-8bjVDrXaGQtdo1doyid7nNkDpoQnJA@mail.gmail.com> <4E14FD81.4040002@kddilabs.jp> <4E154F24.3090600@it.uc3m.es> <4E17990F.6030805@kddilabs.jp> <4E179A65.8070803@earthlink.net> <4E17F951.5070104@it.uc3m.es> <1310401045.64884.YahooMailRC@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E1B2B78.1060501@it.uc3m.es> <1310409836.15625.YahooMailRC@web111404.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E1B607A.9050405@it.uc3m.es> <21E7D9BD69CC7241AAE00F4EA183B719073755@008-AM1MPN1-023.mgdnok.nokia.com> <1310421584.56031.YahooMailRC@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:01:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE_dhjtt_tUGTs5hyXaLJ-zaXHKFXZWVz_v909SyGopfShoccQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: mext@ietf.org, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:01:44 -0000

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Behcet Sarikaya
<behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> DMM was approved as part of the MEXT charter. Why is there a separate
>>discussion list?
>
>
> Ask this to Charlie.
>
> Anyways, the discussion later on moved to the mext list.
> BTW Julien is on dmm list :-)

Yes, I subscribed, aongst other things to make it possible to tell
people on that other list (DMM) that MEXT topics should IMHO be
discussed on the MEXT mailing list if people are expecting to progress
work that impact MEXT protocols:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/current/msg00087.html

--julien

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email