Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks
Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2011 11:05 UTC
Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 12D4A3A6825 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LwLXHBEPqhKf for
<mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com
[209.85.216.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8ED3A6823 for
<mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so4392769qyk.10 for <mext@ietf.org>;
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=FDaS0ifBJFszBvmFPpRh94w7DMP3x10lmejBYtyQi3I=;
b=ftNer8Z6WDfa7RLH4VcW34H8J8YRXlT6VilWdfwJ0P5dbqDX7eEquCHu0FOJ+ZqL0H
kWrQlBXx++4s4yTvQYfwq7BaEfHXnYmBGy8WYEIT0iInzv2o4QuyPM+yxtNGfOaHamiw
oiaDk6HBzHJXBghYIEjpHdiaHsC/bbscytq8U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=bU2PcCQ3HNAd4bwTy+IDzrNGKZuwX0P/mLs++ocSbGpE4u1IPjbJnBhR48jWqKHvOd
6Ep6UrwUTtPRoOl3hPF59fbE0uyLjbnOMgWxXLwH7sEGpZJsSEX4QpfiXiJRp5FyTadQ
w6xAVTeKcVYBGcWTHl3xWh1UQSChX6pup3q6A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.40.208 with SMTP id l16mr3170178qae.72.1300705598180;
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.67.13 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikW+MfR_R4A+g2+o=BZDnsAoOmfLHNgiOm4Z_-n@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikW+MfR_R4A+g2+o=BZDnsAoOmfLHNgiOm4Z_-n@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:06:38 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikGc4JDgzBivYQNGfPTzf8r75L_od2etQMq3Rm5@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: mext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485eba59c230f2e049efc1f72
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:05:07 -0000
Some details that may not be obvious: The victim consumes energy for: - Receiving the messages (continuously waking up from sleep mode) - Processing them and preparing reply packets (L2 and L3) - Sending replies (L2 ACKs and upper layer replies e.g. SIP or TCP replies) Sending replies especially consumes more energy. It was shown that in 802.11 sending 1 bit over the air consumes as much as executing 1,000 CPU instructions. Regards, Pars On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if solutions to energy consumption attacks on battery > powered mobile hosts would be of interest to IETF Mobile IPv6 community. > > The attack consists of sending frequent request packets e.g. SIP INVITE or > TCP SYN to a victim's home address. > > For example, experiments showed that the battery of a mobile phone with > 802.11 access can be remotely consumed in 3 hours (full battery). Attacks on > phones using an outdoor technology would result in more energy consumption > because of the longer distance to the base station. > > The victim becomes unusable. > > Regards, > > Pars >
- [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks QIU Ying
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf