Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 02 August 2011 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB9C21F8ED5 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.353, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mc3wBPNGRBnS for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E8E21F8ED4 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.2) with ESMTP id p72BT09W001585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:29:00 +0200
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p72BT0OG025845; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:29:00 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [132.166.133.178] (is010183.intra.cea.fr [132.166.133.178]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id p72BSx63014313; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:29:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4E37DF7B.4060404@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:28:59 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <4E36F052.8050107@earthlink.net> <77C2DE20B9834174B0856B541F903036@knucpl>
In-Reply-To: <77C2DE20B9834174B0856B541F903036@knucpl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:28:54 -0000

Le 02/08/2011 01:50, Seok-Joo Koh a écrit :
> Dear Charles,
>
> I think the LISP can also be considered as a promising candidate
> in the design of DMM solutions. Several works are being progressed
> to use or extend the LISP for mobility support, which inlcude LISP-MN draft
> and many research papers. Actually, I am also considering how to extend
> the LISP scheme in the DMM perspective.
>
> LISP is a network-based ID-LOC separation scheme and thus it may give some
> advantages for effective mobility support. On the other hand, it is
> noted that
> the current version of LISP and LISP-MN may need to be more enhanced
> in terms of scalability in the mobile environment. For example, one
> concern of LISP
> is that the LISP EIDs may not be aggregated anymore in the mobile
> networks, since
> each mobile node will have its own distinctive EIDs that do not conform
> the concerned mobile domain.
> This may decrease the scaling benefits of original LISP.
> We may need to design a new enhanced EID structure to be used for mobile
> environment.
> Nontheless, it is worthwhile to consider LISP as a promisng candidate in
> the disign of DMM, I think.
>
> By the way, as I already said in this IETF DMM ad hoc meeting,

Sorry, which IETF DMM ad hoc meeting?

Alex

> the
> urgent action item of DMM is
> to make one or more introductory I-Ds with WG consensus, which may include
> the problem statements and requirements for DMM, use cases/scenarios,
> and comparison matrix, etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> *************************
> Seok-Joo Koh
> http://protocol.knu.ac.kr/
> *************************
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles E. Perkins"
> <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
> To: "mext" <mext@ietf.org>
> Cc: <dino@cisco.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:28 AM
> Subject: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement
>
>
>>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> At IETF 81, LISP for mobile devices was presented.
>> While I am not yet convinced about the specific
>> solution presented, I started to look at LISP as
>> a possible component of an overall DMM solution.
>>
>> LISP has a website:
>> http://www.lisp4.net
>>
>> For people who are unfamiliar, this issue of IPJ
>> has a tutorial article about LISP:
>> http://www.lisp4.net/docs/ipj_11-1.pdf
>>
>> The LISP draft for mobile nodes is accessible here:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyer-lisp-mn/
>>
>> Comments? I think that LISP should be added to the
>> comparison matrix in my draft with Dapeng Liu.
>> Would that be helpful?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Charlie P.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>