Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 02 August 2011 11:28 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4FB9C21F8ED5 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.353,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mc3wBPNGRBnS for
<mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr
[132.167.192.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E8E21F8ED4 for
<mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by
cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.2) with ESMTP id
p72BT09W001585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:29:00 +0200
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by
pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p72BT0OG025845;
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:29:00 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [132.166.133.178] (is010183.intra.cea.fr [132.166.133.178]) by
muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id
p72BSx63014313; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:29:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4E37DF7B.4060404@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:28:59 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <4E36F052.8050107@earthlink.net>
<77C2DE20B9834174B0856B541F903036@knucpl>
In-Reply-To: <77C2DE20B9834174B0856B541F903036@knucpl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:28:54 -0000
Le 02/08/2011 01:50, Seok-Joo Koh a écrit : > Dear Charles, > > I think the LISP can also be considered as a promising candidate > in the design of DMM solutions. Several works are being progressed > to use or extend the LISP for mobility support, which inlcude LISP-MN draft > and many research papers. Actually, I am also considering how to extend > the LISP scheme in the DMM perspective. > > LISP is a network-based ID-LOC separation scheme and thus it may give some > advantages for effective mobility support. On the other hand, it is > noted that > the current version of LISP and LISP-MN may need to be more enhanced > in terms of scalability in the mobile environment. For example, one > concern of LISP > is that the LISP EIDs may not be aggregated anymore in the mobile > networks, since > each mobile node will have its own distinctive EIDs that do not conform > the concerned mobile domain. > This may decrease the scaling benefits of original LISP. > We may need to design a new enhanced EID structure to be used for mobile > environment. > Nontheless, it is worthwhile to consider LISP as a promisng candidate in > the disign of DMM, I think. > > By the way, as I already said in this IETF DMM ad hoc meeting, Sorry, which IETF DMM ad hoc meeting? Alex > the > urgent action item of DMM is > to make one or more introductory I-Ds with WG consensus, which may include > the problem statements and requirements for DMM, use cases/scenarios, > and comparison matrix, etc. > > Regards, > > ************************* > Seok-Joo Koh > http://protocol.knu.ac.kr/ > ************************* > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles E. Perkins" > <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> > To: "mext" <mext@ietf.org> > Cc: <dino@cisco.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:28 AM > Subject: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement > > >> >> Hello folks, >> >> At IETF 81, LISP for mobile devices was presented. >> While I am not yet convinced about the specific >> solution presented, I started to look at LISP as >> a possible component of an overall DMM solution. >> >> LISP has a website: >> http://www.lisp4.net >> >> For people who are unfamiliar, this issue of IPJ >> has a tutorial article about LISP: >> http://www.lisp4.net/docs/ipj_11-1.pdf >> >> The LISP draft for mobile nodes is accessible here: >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyer-lisp-mn/ >> >> Comments? I think that LISP should be added to the >> comparison matrix in my draft with Dapeng Liu. >> Would that be helpful? >> >> Regards, >> Charlie P. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MEXT mailing list >> MEXT@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext > > _______________________________________________ > MEXT mailing list > MEXT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >
- [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DM… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Seok-Joo Koh
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Romain KUNTZ
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Seok-Joo Koh
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Seok-Joo Koh
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Marco Liebsch
- Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of th… Marco Liebsch
- [MEXT] Requirements of DMM h chan
- Re: [MEXT] Requirements of DMM Seok-Joo Koh
- Re: [MEXT] Requirements of DMM h chan
- Re: [MEXT] Requirements of DMM h chan
- Re: [MEXT] Requirements of DMM h chan