Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item

<Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> Mon, 07 November 2011 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B21421F89BA for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:41:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nU64Fo0qbyul for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tcmail13.telekom.de (tcmail13.telekom.de [80.149.113.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4AE21F849D for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from he110890.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.92.131]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Nov 2011 17:41:12 +0100
Received: from HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.4.57]) by he110890 ([10.134.92.131]) with mapi; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 17:41:12 +0100
From: <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
To: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>, <thierry.ernst@inria.fr>, <mext@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 17:41:11 +0100
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
Thread-Index: AQHMnU+LpgPh6JdNH0ai4mFC5mfMF5WhjvZAgAANrBA=
Message-ID: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A267664CB53@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <4EAA9B4A.3020208@piuha.net> <4EB7D7C9.3040303@gmail.com> <4EB7DA40.3080807@inria.fr> <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F01B743@EXMBX04.ad.utwente.nl>
In-Reply-To: <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F01B743@EXMBX04.ad.utwente.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: mobopts@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:41:42 -0000

Dear all,
I agree with the importance of the topic and remember that at least in the mobopts session the charter of which should be under discussion/revision this topic was also mentioned ...
Would that work - or is the intention more on vehicular engineering rather than research topics?

Regards
Dirk

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von karagian@cs.utwente.nl
Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2011 16:52
An: thierry.ernst@inria.fr; mext@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item

Hi all,

I agree with Alex and Thierry on this issue!
Where is the best place at the IETF to discuss and work out automotive requirements?

Best regards,
Georgios

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Thierry Ernst
> Sent: maandag 7 november 2011 14:17
> To: mext@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
>
>
> Thanks Alex for raising this.
>
> My view on this is that the automotive industry has some needs that are
> partly related to NEMO RO, but not only related to NEMO.
>
> So, I would like to seek advice from our AD about where would be the best
> place at the IETF to discuss automotive requirements related to IPv6 ?
>
> Regarding the dratf itself, it is our intention to update it.
>
> Regards,
> Thierry
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 07/11/11 14:06, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> > Hello Jari, WG members,
> >
> >
> > Le 28/10/2011 14:08, Jari Arkko a écrit :
> >> All,
> >>
> >> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have
> >> successfully published a large number of specifications in recent
> >> years, recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group.
> >> The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we
> >> need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are
> >> terminating the working group and moving the one remaining active
> >> work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working group. Here's
> >> what is going to happen:
> >>
> >> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the
> >> group.
> >>
> >> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda).
> >>
> >> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the
> >> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this
> >> charter change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting
> >> agenda should reserve some time both for technical discussions as
> >> well as the charter discussion.
> >>
> >> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we
> >> will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect.
> >>
> >> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to
> >> publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD
> >> sponsor them to RFCs outside the new working group.
> >
> > I wonder what is the plan about
> > draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02? "Automotive Industry
> > Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization"
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02
> >
> > I can see a number of options to move it forward, like for example:
> > - change in authorship, title.
> > - continue as part of new Charter (fulfill earlier objectives) or
> >   sponsor separately per your offer.
> > - change in focus.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >> If there is some significant new activity, we can create new working
> >> groups for that.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are
> >> welcome.
> >>
> >> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in
> >> MEXT. We could not have completed all the work we did without your
> >> energy and push for high quality results. We would also like to thank
> >> Jouni for taking on this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the
> >> work in this space.
> >>
> >> Jari and Ralph
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________ MEXT
> mailing list
> >> MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MEXT mailing list
> > MEXT@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext