Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item

[<[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

I agree with Alex and Thierry on this issue!
Where is the best place at the IETF to discuss and work out automotive requirements?

Best regards,
Georgios

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Thierry Ernst
> Sent: maandag 7 november 2011 14:17
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
> 
> 
> Thanks Alex for raising this.
> 
> My view on this is that the automotive industry has some needs that are
> partly related to NEMO RO, but not only related to NEMO.
> 
> So, I would like to seek advice from our AD about where would be the best
> place at the IETF to discuss automotive requirements related to IPv6 ?
> 
> Regarding the dratf itself, it is our intention to update it.
> 
> Regards,
> Thierry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/11/11 14:06, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> > Hello Jari, WG members,
> >
> >
> > Le 28/10/2011 14:08, Jari Arkko a écrit :
> >> All,
> >>
> >> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have
> >> successfully published a large number of specifications in recent
> >> years, recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group.
> >> The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we
> >> need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are
> >> terminating the working group and moving the one remaining active
> >> work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working group. Here's
> >> what is going to happen:
> >>
> >> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the
> >> group.
> >>
> >> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda).
> >>
> >> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the
> >> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this
> >> charter change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting
> >> agenda should reserve some time both for technical discussions as
> >> well as the charter discussion.
> >>
> >> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we
> >> will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect.
> >>
> >> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to
> >> publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD
> >> sponsor them to RFCs outside the new working group.
> >
> > I wonder what is the plan about
> > draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02? "Automotive Industry
> > Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization"
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02
> >
> > I can see a number of options to move it forward, like for example:
> > - change in authorship, title.
> > - continue as part of new Charter (fulfill earlier objectives) or
> >   sponsor separately per your offer.
> > - change in focus.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >> If there is some significant new activity, we can create new working
> >> groups for that.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are
> >> welcome.
> >>
> >> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in
> >> MEXT. We could not have completed all the work we did without your
> >> energy and push for high quality results. We would also like to thank
> >> Jouni for taking on this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the
> >> work in this space.
> >>
> >> Jari and Ralph
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________ MEXT
> mailing list
> >> [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MEXT mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext