IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement

"Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> Mon, 01 August 2011 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5137411E808E for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mrdtck7ThK+d for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E820511E8077 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=jNx/QXMrcY7CyoeB3M6T/9CDpk+dPWc7FL+3C13vZmxHNUbYgY6TcuQI42nStQyM; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [138.111.58.2] (helo=[172.17.96.56]) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>) id 1QnxEC-0002xU-JD; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:28:36 -0400
Message-ID: <4E36F052.8050107@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:28:34 -0700
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Organization: Wichorus Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext <mext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956d5d4673fe7faad8609718d7801d63eb5904e6fea6a2e5bcb350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 138.111.58.2
Cc: dino@cisco.com
Subject: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:28:33 -0000

Hello folks,

At IETF 81, LISP for mobile devices was presented.
While I am not yet convinced about the specific
solution presented, I started to look at LISP as
a possible component of an overall DMM solution.

LISP has a website:
http://www.lisp4.net

For people who are unfamiliar, this issue of IPJ
has a tutorial article about LISP:
http://www.lisp4.net/docs/ipj_11-1.pdf

The LISP draft for mobile nodes is accessible here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyer-lisp-mn/

Comments?  I think that LISP should be added to the
comparison matrix in my draft with Dapeng Liu.
Would that be helpful?

Regards,
Charlie P.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email