IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] Mobile IPv6 label and Mobile IPv6 protocol changes

Thierry Ernst <thierry.ernst@inria.fr> Thu, 24 March 2011 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <thierry.ernst@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E73E3A68C2 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZ4wT1vKpwbB for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2998828C112 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.63,237,1299452400"; d="vcf'?scan'208"; a="103422367"
Received: from vir78-1-87-88-164-205.dsl.club-internet.fr (HELO [192.168.1.3]) ([87.88.164.205]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA; 24 Mar 2011 15:00:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4D8B4E62.50903@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:00:02 +0100
From: Thierry Ernst <thierry.ernst@inria.fr>
Organization: INRIA
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C69021B3A@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4D7E64EE.5030302@it.uc3m.es> <4D860B93.4030602@gmail.com> <4D88ACE6.6030207@it.uc3m.es> <4D88B3A5.7050302@gmail.com> <4D88B7B5.4020903@it.uc3m.es> <4D88C23B.4020709@gmail.com> <4D88D22D.300@it.uc3m.es> <4D88FC52.4090309@gmail.com> <AANLkTimP84zss62OuTddFGLgDd5GAw1M7ctZh+Nxbkmj@mail.gmail.com> <4D890BD4.8060502@gmail.com> <AANLkTim_wYf+=OsgzOTpm5wWz+sPi564Tpph0HpY57XW@mail.gmail.com> <7758DEF9-FD80-428B-95F1-782C9EB9373D@inria.fr> <AANLkTimuMPUaHSiFvxv9GBR_H8UxTet7R7wiRf+f4CPP@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimuMPUaHSiFvxv9GBR_H8UxTet7R7wiRf+f4CPP@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000909090401080406060709"
Cc: mext <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Mobile IPv6 label and Mobile IPv6 protocol changes
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:58:31 -0000

Hi Julien,

What is the timestamp associated with your question regarding interest 
from WG members ? I did say I have interest in this, but this was a 
while ago (and it stills holds).

I'm not attending the IETF meeting this time but I would be happy to 
ear/read what are the conclusions of the MEXT WG regarding Alex's draft are.

Regards,
Thierry




On 23/03/11 15:55, Julien Laganier wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Thierry Ernst<thierry.ernst@inria.fr>  wrote:
>> Juiien,
>>
>> Please read below.
>>
>> Le 22 mars 2011 à 23:26, Julien Laganier a écrit :
>>
>>> 2. If I am not mistaken you were already given a chance to present
>>> this draft in a MEXT session, at which point nobody in the WG
>>> expressed interest in it.
>> This is not what I would called a fair statement. There are people on this list that DO have interest in this work - including me -, though I agree it might not be the priority of the WG (which is quite different from what you wrote - please be careful with such a statement - of course I'm sure you didn't really mean it).
> Please read my statements carefully before calling on their fairness.
> I did not write nobody in the WG was interested, I wrote that nobody
> in the WG expressed interest. Did you expressed interest in this
> specific draft when it was announced to the mailing list? If so, it
> would seem I have missed your message and I would apologize...
>
> --julien

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email