Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement

"Seok-Joo Koh" <sjkoh@knu.ac.kr> Mon, 01 August 2011 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sjkoh@knu.ac.kr>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B045E8017 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.208, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hicbq4xKiWNV for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spam2.knu.ac.kr (spam2.knu.ac.kr [155.230.10.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EA85E8015 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO knu.ac.kr) (155.230.11.8) by 155.230.10.253 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2011 08:46:18 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 155.230.11.8
X-Original-MAILFROM: sjkoh@knu.ac.kr
x-beehive-trace: sjkoh@knu.ac.kr mext@ietf.org 155.230.105.149
Received: from knu.ac.kr by ietf.org with ESMTP (knu.ac.kr) for mext@ietf.org; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 08:50:17 +0900 (KST)
x-beehive-kind: normal
x-beehive-modified: received kind
Message-ID: <77C2DE20B9834174B0856B541F903036@knucpl>
From: "Seok-Joo Koh" <sjkoh@knu.ac.kr>
To: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>, "mext" <mext@ietf.org>
References: <4E36F052.8050107@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 08:50:18 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
Cc: dino@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:50:24 -0000

Dear Charles,

I think the LISP can also be considered as a promising candidate
in the design of DMM solutions. Several works are being progressed
to use or extend the LISP for mobility support, which inlcude LISP-MN draft
and many research papers. Actually, I am also considering how to extend
the LISP scheme in the DMM perspective.

LISP is a network-based ID-LOC separation scheme and thus it may give some
advantages for effective mobility support. On the other hand, it is noted that
the current version of LISP and LISP-MN may need to be more enhanced
in terms of scalability in the mobile environment. For example, one concern of LISP
is that the LISP EIDs may not be aggregated anymore in the mobile networks, since
each mobile node will have its own distinctive EIDs that do not conform the concerned mobile domain.
This may decrease the scaling benefits of original LISP.
We may need to design a new enhanced EID structure to be used for mobile environment.
Nontheless, it is worthwhile to consider LISP as a promisng candidate in the disign of DMM, I think.

By the way, as I already said in this IETF DMM ad hoc meeting, the urgent action item of DMM is
to make one or more introductory I-Ds with WG consensus, which may include
the problem statements and requirements for DMM, use cases/scenarios, and comparison matrix, etc.

Regards,

*************************
Seok-Joo Koh
http://protocol.knu.ac.kr/
*************************

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
To: "mext" <mext@ietf.org>
Cc: <dino@cisco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:28 AM
Subject: [MEXT] LISP as a solution for some part of the DMM requirement


>
> Hello folks,
>
> At IETF 81, LISP for mobile devices was presented.
> While I am not yet convinced about the specific
> solution presented, I started to look at LISP as
> a possible component of an overall DMM solution.
>
> LISP has a website:
> http://www.lisp4.net
>
> For people who are unfamiliar, this issue of IPJ
> has a tutorial article about LISP:
> http://www.lisp4.net/docs/ipj_11-1.pdf
>
> The LISP draft for mobile nodes is accessible here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyer-lisp-mn/
>
> Comments?  I think that LISP should be added to the
> comparison matrix in my draft with Dapeng Liu.
> Would that be helpful?
>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext