Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Mon, 31 October 2011 21:33 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06711F0C9C for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.674, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZVT3YQIKCMAE for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2EB1F0C8B for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so7613291gyh.31 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+R0IkLieEYru16BWh/yzNGoiFSPCU3lCOiS8zEXDZ2s=; b=OWUKFZxnMm1NaMoNI3wzHvOdumCfdyHIAvvb81NCH4ix3FEUAiKUQK/f6E0ft88x2z HyBt09qM1Ai7x/ICSU2PJ1S7PPOfOHkREAGxe+29XjXPI0Lz/QE1+Cl69mLFzBSSAnxB I3yQYgMYXDW8Z619tZsKq6Qt+BIJqrHu8JUQc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.154.137 with SMTP id h9mr19114917yhk.26.1320096834372; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.110.39 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4EAEFE03.3010900@piuha.net>
References: <4EAA9B4A.3020208@piuha.net> <B8AC77DD-B9AA-4E02-96C2-F4C0F7FB8384@gmail.com> <4EAEFE03.3010900@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:33:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAccDmrQ=6-OeCrXnFWUKWhKZP2qti4gBGqV2C-cOdigsww@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303b4427e1c50304b09efe25"
Cc: "jouni.korhonen@nsn.com" <jouni.korhonen@nsn.com>, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:33:55 -0000
Hi Jari, draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-03.txt is for the charter item: Sep 2011 - Submit I-D 'Home agent discovery in IPv4-only networks via DHCP' to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard. This is the only draft offered as a solution for this charter item. The draft has received comments by DHCP experts like Ted Lemon and Tomek Mrugalski and revised accordingly. I think that it is ready for publication. What should we do? Regards, Behcet On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote: > Did it successfully complete WGLC? With sufficient support for taking the > document forward? If yes, the chairs can either send it immediately to me > as a WG output. > > Or I can AD sponsor it later. The offer to AD sponsor is also valid for > other documents. They need to be in reasonable shape, naturally. > > Jari > > > On 31.10.2011 19:08, Ryuji Wakikawa wrote: > >> Jari >> >> Thanks for this update. I want to clarify plan of the existing activity, >> HA reliability doc, in MEXT. >> This document completed WGLC and went nowhere after all. >> It supposes to be proposed standard RFC. >> Do you want to finish this work with AD sponsor? or just trash it? >> >> thanks >> ryuji >> >> On 2011/10/28, at 5:08, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> All, >>> >>> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have >>> successfully published a large number of specifications in recent years, >>> recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group. The chairs >>> and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we need a new focus and >>> a bit of new organization as well. We are terminating the working group and >>> moving the one remaining active work item to a new working group, the "DMM" >>> working group. Here's what is going to happen: >>> >>> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the >>> group. >>> >>> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda). >>> >>> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the >>> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this charter >>> change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting agenda should >>> reserve some time both for technical discussions as well as the charter >>> discussion. >>> >>> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we >>> will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect. >>> >>> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to >>> publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD sponsor >>> them to RFCs outside the new working group. If there is some significant >>> new activity, we can create new working groups for that. >>> >>> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are >>> welcome. >>> >>> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in MEXT. >>> We could not have completed all the work we did without your energy and >>> push for high quality results. We would also like to thank Jouni for taking >>> on this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the work in this space. >>> >>> Jari and Ralph >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> MEXT mailing list >>> MEXT@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/mext<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext> >>> >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > MEXT mailing list > MEXT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/mext<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext> >
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hui Deng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hui Deng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Thierry Ernst
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group liu dapeng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item (was: the futu… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Thierry Ernst
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item karagian
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group liu dapeng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group liu dapeng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group h chan