Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 22 March 2011 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1BD28C1DB for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqtSyKHD5EVY for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C5E28C112 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so6574226fxm.31 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2RH9v6YQemSbHanqDAlhSSwKrr/YeK60oqnqGeJ1/hc=; b=tdCCNLyjEpQmdD24tuReMjrEFmqUooW0GLQpZFiHfV3RM0Yz8wlLolkpeR5R+YVkxL BJ3O+BpqO5HYAnzc7Ah5vC6wXqUua1tRYDL7NTBiehtn5iVmP81CdcT09asbks0C5q6b YgHatwKOvj/Iod7EsUPv8Zj+H6bGkMLEr+1C4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Mkp3Yw0lP4yVGZSPKYLYLNbcn9wbQpVHQXLDSXcdZUYvVJjhWy1uH9w6CiLvPNSUZu U0vDfvXaF+h9c7TcA7v6LatcJFsHuPGW78AAt8fdcC8e+EYpn/uZIRqZIicr8J9mDLUe eIpEQBekygEzWdqKE3jegYHrWuyr51BoQD5iA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.78.201 with SMTP id m9mr1306998fak.20.1300764461873; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.78.135 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikW+MfR_R4A+g2+o=BZDnsAoOmfLHNgiOm4Z_-n@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikW+MfR_R4A+g2+o=BZDnsAoOmfLHNgiOm4Z_-n@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:27:41 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxc0=p-HAqJ--ZFBQgFEpFw-tit_M5CPH8zoqg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 03:26:11 -0000

Pars -

How is this attack related to MIPv6?

--julien

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if solutions to energy consumption attacks on battery
> powered mobile hosts would be of interest to IETF Mobile IPv6 community.
>
> The attack consists of sending frequent request packets e.g. SIP INVITE or
> TCP SYN to a victim's home address.
>
> For example, experiments showed that the battery of a mobile phone with
> 802.11 access can be remotely consumed in 3 hours (full battery). Attacks on
> phones using an outdoor technology would result in more energy consumption
> because of the longer distance to the base station.
>
> The victim becomes unusable.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pars
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
>