[MEXT] rfc 6089 implementation
Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it> Fri, 03 June 2011 06:52 UTC
Return-Path: <stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 2D360E0696 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-MpyuKVz+WP for
<mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uniroma2.it (smtp.uniroma2.it [160.80.6.23]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B12BE0662 for <mext@ietf.org>;
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth.uniroma2.it (smtpauth.uniroma2.it [160.80.6.46]) by
smtp.uniroma2.it (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p536g4ko019584
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:42:05 +0200
Received: from [79.43.225.109]
(host109-225-dynamic.43-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.43.225.109])
(authenticated bits=0) by smtpauth.uniroma2.it (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4)
with ESMTP id p536qfGP028472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:52:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4DE884BC.7000107@uniroma2.it>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:52:44 +0200
From: Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it
Cc: marco bonola <marco.bonola@uniroma2.it>
Subject: [MEXT] rfc 6089 implementation
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:52:54 -0000
Hi all, we are doing research about IP mobility and we developed a solution based on IP in UDP tunneling (http://netgroup.uniroma2.it/UPMT) we have a question about RFC 6089 - Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support is there any implementation of such RFC? if so, can anybody provide some information and links ? thank you, best regards Stefano -- ******************************************************************* Stefano Salsano Dipartimento Ingegneria Elettronica Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata" Via del Politecnico, 1 - 00133 Roma - ITALY http://netgroup.uniroma2.it/Stefano_Salsano/ E-mail : stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it Cell. : +39 320 4307310 Office : (Tel.) +39 06 72597770 (Fax.) +39 06 72597435 *******************************************************************
- [MEXT] rfc 6089 implementation Stefano Salsano
- Re: [MEXT] rfc 6089 implementation Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] rfc 6089 implementation Gerardo Giaretta