Re: [MEXT] IETF-81

"Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl> Sat, 09 July 2011 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDE321F86AB; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 02:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.784
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.784 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qw6SFQB+lDgx; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 02:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl (denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E5F21F86A1; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 02:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.cs.utwente.nl (janus.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.26]) by denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id p699gXIS014095; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 11:42:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from 84.82.109.231 (auth. user karagian@imap1.ewi.utwente.nl) by webmail.cs.utwente.nl with HTTP; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:44:16 +0000
To: "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>, "yokota@kddilabs.jp" <yokota@kddilabs.jp>, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:44:15 +0000
X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.13 (On: webmail.cs.utwente.nl)
Message-ID: <7hwJ7VBC.1310204655.9477880.karagian@ewi.utwente.nl>
In-Reply-To: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
From: Georgios Karagiannis <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
Bounce-To: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
Errors-To: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 130.89.10.11
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0rc3 (denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.11]); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:42:45 +0200 (MEST)
Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:44:15 -0000

Hi Dirk, Hi Alexandru

I am also interested in having a f2f meeting in Quebec to discuss
vehicular topics!

As I already understood, this meeting does not need to be seen as a MEXT
meeting.

Best regards,
Georgios

On 7/4/2011, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
wrote:

>Dear all,
>I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
>Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?
>
>Best regards
>Dirk
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
>An: mext@ietf.org
>Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
>
>Hi Julien and all,
>
>Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
>"Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
>discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
>consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
>will be needed.
>
>Please take a look at the following I-D:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt
>
>Thanks in advance for your support,
>--
>Hidetoshi
>
>(2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>>
>> --julien&  marcelo
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>MEXT@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>MEXT@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext