IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] Call for WG adoption of I-D: draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-altsec

Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp> Wed, 26 January 2011 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F493A6906 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:39:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MRt0lObfLSNb for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:12::16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC3D3A6905 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:39:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71770174810C for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:42:00 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5no+-TzKoqMo for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:41:58 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp [172.19.90.145]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B23174810A for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:41:58 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (yokotaiMac.mn.mip.kddilabs.jp [172.19.90.26]) by ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217941B85F for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:41:55 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <4D3F7BDF.1040207@kddilabs.jp>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:41:51 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <4D3DD426.6080107@it.uc3m.es> <4D3DE564.30505@go6.si>
In-Reply-To: <4D3DE564.30505@go6.si>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Call for WG adoption of I-D: draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-altsec
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:39:09 -0000

Hi,

I also tested the implementation, which worked very well, succeeding in
setting up an inter-continental MIPv6 connection without any hassle. I
believe that the I-D can resolve one of the deployment issues and thus
support it as a WG draft. I hope to see it really deployed in commercial
mobile networks and devices.

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2011/01/25 5:47), Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
> On 1/24/11 8:33 PM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
>> The ID has had 3 reviews as we require.
>> So, we are now ready to ask the WG if they think we should adopt the
>> document.
>>
>> Please express your opinion before monday 31st jan.
> 
> Well, I think this I-D should go forward as it solves some issues with 
> current thinking of mobile part of the stack, and it has an 
> implementation, that works fine.
> 
> Regards, Jan Zorz
> go6.si
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email