IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] IETF-80 meeting minutes posted / clarifications on draft-liu-mext-distributed-mobile-ip

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Thu, 28 April 2011 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366D7E06A6 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.414, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VEEQAkg4wyIe for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D3508E0679 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.67] by nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2011 20:29:13 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.52] by tm7.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2011 20:29:13 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1052.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2011 20:29:13 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 190222.13953.bm@omp1052.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 72708 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2011 20:29:12 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304022552; bh=ZYL/J/l70hWP6WBLdIQFPgNpK9yYLjKL43KEI37aPVc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hFe7nNTsCTcgueYE9P6pCfhDtl2u92KtR1Z757CS76wP0QCuYvXJ+oSxnSwW3gWpLNHah7HMspMw/zUrFXnT2T40raFzODfl3ZG6y31ICSTfVN0MGFlZUBYWUn1ARmqUMdPoHfaH+FKhfxDAeVIWPu97PR8R0wjKG5Df8LU16Y0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4Se9hMQ6GJ3c3CY8UcE1DZnagaaiJ38J6KIP/evNEEeJrvX/JnJ3fwk0PldBb8Caf/iGQf1As4i4tH9IH6FBfZV9Ds4Jvvia5y4D8X7FOoxyX9d9YSWLjtA1MWJieHEvwwp+AG4+9pOl/W5M9AfmEfXbnL6OoZjENxN+Fv0AC4U=;
Message-ID: <684224.63702.qm@web111410.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: x_0mJyAVM1lSQYGC_kiSt6xYgDmix5u.bQalFU4.Wdo2aoe aqbrcZBrjS_tXoNvFIWhBHdp_iiVXfUaRX4qlk7X6t64wWrJSQtTabl1oJwy 17jSMtoKnXM1ptifmt7kwgfky2mCOtLTxJ88zR5a7zkqDnRTht_0lT8SGp6E RleC1jfeveAlGfRMhZPLXl_YpHmhUlqkRu9_LzJa_K5QtoXNsYwnCXLMb8L1 fb6qCqy54g72DwcXbfoYnHeBRisihUUv9sJ3N6.6agREArkh51LEi3ZkCEye bpy4z7T72v4Wj7agkpfTkOw1Ob_eiY_bdmQbGSIqgbzE70GCjwXP._P1_yKS E_bN.FxajRTC9VtlbOqXSVJUveJWo2iuQr49xuPnXY1ReVd4AUpVO95sd_Fo UXkXEq8JUY1UzHw--
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111410.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:29:12 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900
References: <BANLkTimN4Czxq-g8ZGo+zUysNFxrBDGi6g@mail.gmail.com> <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C46201A55BA2@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4DAFD81A.8060307@go6.si> <98550E8B-9F06-4719-981C-D6D5FD11FCB8@us.toyota-itc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:29:12 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Romain KUNTZ <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com>, "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan@go6.si>
In-Reply-To: <98550E8B-9F06-4719-981C-D6D5FD11FCB8@us.toyota-itc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] IETF-80 meeting minutes posted / clarifications on draft-liu-mext-distributed-mobile-ip
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:29:17 -0000

Hi Romain,


> 
> Hello Jan,
> 
> On Apr 21, 2011, at 0:09, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
> > From my point of view and how we  are deploying mobility here it is desirable 
>(or for our case mandatory) for MN  to use only one stable HoA at all times, not 
>many of them. At the same time it  would be very nice to have multiple HAs, so 
>you could connect to nearest one and  optimize the path.
> > 
> > My thought was to anycast HA address where  MN connects and deal with HoA 
>advertising on network side with dynamic routing  protocols.
> 
> You may have a look at Global  HAHA:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wakikawa-mext-global-haha-spec-01

Thanks for pointing this out, I was almost reading another draft.
I think Global HAHA is good, it solves almost all problems we have in DMM maybe 

the expense of introducing a fairly complicated protocol and a lot of 
configuration requirements.

Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email