Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81
Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 July 2011 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD9521F85B1; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EfUG8nRgVgYp; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAC621F85AC; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwb17 with SMTP id 17so137954bwb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ap2vOSgto8SFnFCTJ+CHVq8/t+uMpOM44bl5wpoB1ss=; b=B0Hn6PCCf5UTiLxZWmh1H+4pP/+OMpa7qp1HANJ6Lx4J58Msm5L7DG03JWv3l7+63P FoSIY/75VziDQGJK2A/fqDi+wwRolV9fp/Cum+ybVt70wRdxbZHq16o1MRrq+C/044wm gypXH/l8Gqf/i894OqcLXxRdbvj2uPpbRh3oM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.42.129 with SMTP id s1mr7513412bke.213.1309962716312; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.65.193 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E142285.4080400@kddilabs.jp>
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com> <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CAE_dhju9phhpBdyUwUgGK576DTJKyM9BbsLV-cYyHd+RwNRvvw@mail.gmail.com> <4E142285.4080400@kddilabs.jp>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:31:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE_dhjvEzGgpn_e1rVp-8bjVDrXaGQtdo1doyid7nNkDpoQnJA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: mext@ietf.org, dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:31:59 -0000
Hidetoshi, If WG mailing list on a given topic doesn' t happen in a timely fashion, I would suggest that either people are not interested in the topic, or it's not urgent to them. If a topic isn't urgent for people, then IMHO giving them face-to-face time isn't urgent either. --julien On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp> wrote: > Hi Julien, > > WG mailing list is the base of the discussion, but sometimes it takes very > long time to proceed, by which it loses timeliness. Network-initiated flow > mobility or Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) come from urgent needs and > IETF has the reputation of responding to such needs in a timely manner. F2F > meeting is generally more efficient than ML discussion and effective for the > chairs to progress the standards process. I believe that ML discussion and > F2F meeting are the two wheels of moving I-Ds forward and we shouldn't miss > the opportunity of F2F meetings, which happen only three times in a year. > > Regards, > -- > Hidetoshi > > (2011/07/06 0:29), Julien Laganier wrote: >> >> Dirk and Hidetoshi, >> >> Face to face meeting time should IMHO primarily be used to resolve >> issues that cannot be resolved on the WG mailing list. As of now I do >> not see any, hence the absence of a MEXT WG meeting. >> >> Best, >> >> --julien >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:09 AM,<Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need >>> more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and >>> potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list. >>> Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in >>> http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/? >>> >>> Best regards >>> Dirk >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von >>> Hidetoshi Yokota >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12 >>> An: mext@ietf.org >>> Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 >>> >>> Hi Julien and all, >>> >>> Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of >>> "Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to >>> discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got >>> consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting >>> will be needed. >>> >>> Please take a look at the following I-D: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt >>> >>> Thanks in advance for your support, >>> -- >>> Hidetoshi >>> >>> (2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote: >>>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require >>>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec. >>>> >>>> --julien& marcelo >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> MEXT mailing list >>>> MEXT@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MEXT mailing list >>> MEXT@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> dmm@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >> >> >> > >
- [MEXT] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Ashutosh Dutta
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] IETF-81 Thierry Ernst
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81 Julien Laganier