Re: [MEXT] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6276 (3078)

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 05 January 2012 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C6E21F8603 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:52:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sxLCyn0F5HsL for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.176.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9968921F8879 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:52:02 -0800 (PST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9827572C358; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:52:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1325789520.3890.64.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:52:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20120105102405.4BFA8B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20120105102405.4BFA8B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wyl1FPi+7eC4qJsMugVD"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3-3
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.8.0.1017-18628.000
Cc: jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, mext@ietf.org, rdroms@cisco.com, Wassim.Haddad@ericsson.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, fdupont@isc.org, sofiane.imadali@cea.fr, julien.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6276 (3078)
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:52:10 -0000

Hi,

I agree with the errata.

Carlos

On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 02:24 -0800, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6276,
> "DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6276&eid=3078
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Sofiane IMADALI <sofiane.imadali@cea.fr>;
> 
> Section: 3.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the home agent is at home
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the Mobile Router is at home
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The figure name is not corresponding to the section's name. In addition, the home agent is always at home.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6276 (draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)
> Publication Date    : July 2011
> Author(s)           : R. Droms, P. Thubert, F. Dupont, W. Haddad, C. Bernardos
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

-- 
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano  http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67