IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17301F0C41 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.867, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id liENCjGDBAeR for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com (slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.64.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10B521F8BEE for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com (blv-av-01.boeing.com [130.247.48.231]) by slb-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id p95IcOH2014139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with SMTP id p95IcOxI019442; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-05.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-05.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.109]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p95IcLWi019408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.64.120]) by XCH-NWHT-05.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.109]) with mapi; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:38:22 -0700
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>, "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:38:20 -0700
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] RFC 6301
Thread-Index: Acx+DGy2lyV9yOXtSF6hJHRoC/dE/AFf2XYwAABgG/A=
Message-ID: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C77323024@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <CAC8QAcecmV4iOywuzK-Hm_ErJTNkNhcSU5_pkRjvDJe8AR=JJQ@mail.gmail.com> <C1346BD6-DF63-40F9-B0B5-9FD6E5FAB5D8@gmail.com> <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C77323010@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C77323010@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:35:18 -0000

Also, I think I see an errata candidate in RFC6301:

-   [Boeing]   Andrew, L., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)",
-              Boeing White Paper, 2006.

I suspect this should instead be:

+   [Boeing]   Dul, A., "Global IP Network Mobility using Border
+              Gateway Protocol (BGP)", Boeing White Paper, 2006.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:25 AM
> To: Ryuji Wakikawa; sarikaya@ieee.org
> Cc: mext@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301
> 
> The survey seems to have missed IRON (RFC6179), which
> along with its supporting technologies (VET, SEAL, AERO)
> comprehensively addresses the mobility solution space.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Ryuji Wakikawa
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:28 AM
> > To: sarikaya@ieee.org
> > Cc: mext@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301
> > 
> > Hi Behcet
> > 
> > Thanks for the message. I believe there are  plenty of 
> > potential issues MEXT group can solve...
> > 
> > ryuji
> > 
> > On 2011/09/27, at 14:59, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > >   Have you seen this recently issued RFC 6301? I suggest 
> > taking a look at it. Good survey from way back 1991 to this 
> > date, thanks to Ryuji.
> > > It covers protocols like LISP and GTP (yes, GTP) and raises 
> > the issue of interworking such as between Mobile IP and HIP, 
> > I would add Mobile IP and SIP mobility.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Behcet
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MEXT mailing list
> > > MEXT@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MEXT mailing list
> > MEXT@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email