IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work

liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> Tue, 08 March 2011 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC243A6813; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:11:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eiMuiQn7+x9; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9933A6778; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:11:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so5892762iwl.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:12:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jY4Fq8ou/VCkQG96B5KBYKxh/SUGZtzJ8hafuAXpGlk=; b=Ovj31o/+xiNDINDh0n4PwFjkA933+GtI7o+2oUfDooK+fD8/xLT+28jib5WU/bDzSP jrv4nv0BcEAdbrzJ9L59YBQIXIbbLozUrsI20gbmaQ3WyM3kwpXD7Fkqv3+E8DdelyFx C+2gBdSf+lkqPDNTRAahjjku4GvvRovMRMRn8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Txv2OONVO09r8aJcj4XM/4MXBfno1mjhPeb5FFFbDHergSKvv12SQRr0uEHxZyoMmI IO5k+igRw4mqaY5BwTPFzwiSi2/dK4REWtOCzhBp2x4drGHIrRilSIB01A9Fbk36HkFD DmBuWXSfTZ1ycG8WRKyVWBVgzmScIlwjTXiw4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.146.70 with SMTP id i6mr5613671icv.361.1299575568126; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.213.67 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:12:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D71839A.7090604@computer.org>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com> <339086.13026.qm@web111412.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <AANLkTinTO-Xe=1hQvhKaxEyfBkjU=mWOA=tBuP7r1wyP@mail.gmail.com> <4D71839A.7090604@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:12:48 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikneniiNEUyPOLT3e5dajVm0quo+-7gm4v8t3=O@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: charliep@computer.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, dmm@ietf.org, mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:11:39 -0000

Hi Charlie,

My understanding is that the socpe of DMM work item in MEXT should be
limited to no protocol extensions. Let's continue this discussion in
the DT mail list.

Best regards,
Dapeng Liu

2011/3/5, Charles E. Perkins <charliep@computer.org>rg>:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'd also like to be involved with the effort.
>
> I have two questions:
>
> - Does route optimization have a role to play?
>    It certainly can serve the purpose of distributing
>    traffic optimally...

> - What about a sort of "hierarchical PMIP"?
>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
>
> On 3/2/2011 7:17 PM, liu dapeng wrote:
>> Hi Behcet,
>>
>>
>> 2011/2/19, Behcet Sarikaya<behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>om>:
>>> Hi Dapeng,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello Julien,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the information. But my question is: since the  charter is
>>>> extended to "work on operational considerations on setting up  Mobile
>>>> IPv6 networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way".  Does
>>>> it mean that the extended charter include  problem/gap/scenario
>>>> analysis of distributing the mobility anchor  (DMM)?
>>>>
>>>> I remember it seem that people agreed to do the analysis work of  DMM
>>>> as the first step in Beijing meeting?
>>>
>>> My understanding is that the new informational document will be inline
>>> with
>>> Julien's presentation he had in Beijing mext additional session we had on
>>> dmm
>>> and explain how MIPv6 as defined currently can be used to distribute the
>>> traffic
>>> in an optimal way.
>>>
>>> I suggest that you take the lead in this effort.
>>
>> ==>
>>
>> I think DMM barbof contributors have already done some work in this
>> area. So if people agree I would like to organize writing this draft.
>> Anyone who is interested
>> to join the design team could reply this mail to let me know. thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dapeng Liu
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Behcet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email