Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item (was: the future of the MEXT working group)

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 07 November 2011 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA3421F8AEC for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 05:06:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.238, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwv6B0P30flY for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 05:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB67C21F8AC3 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 05:06:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.2) with ESMTP id pA7D6OeK020216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:06:24 +0100
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA7D6N8k030600 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:06:23 +0100 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.133.173]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id pA7D6Heq002869 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:06:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB7D7C9.3040303@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:06:17 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <4EAA9B4A.3020208@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EAA9B4A.3020208@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item (was: the future of the MEXT working group)
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:06:30 -0000

Hello Jari, WG members,


Le 28/10/2011 14:08, Jari Arkko a écrit :
> All,
>
> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have
> successfully published a large number of specifications in recent
> years, recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group.
> The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we
> need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are
> terminating the working group and moving the one remaining active
> work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working group. Here's
> what is going to happen:
>
> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the
> group.
>
> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the
> agenda).
>
> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the
> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this
> charter change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting
> agenda should reserve some time both for technical discussions as
> well as the charter discussion.
>
> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished,
> we will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect.
>
> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to
> publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD
> sponsor them to RFCs outside the new working group.

I wonder what is the plan about
draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02? "Automotive Industry
Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization"
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02

I can see a number of options to move it forward, like for example:
- change in authorship, title.
- continue as part of new Charter (fulfill earlier objectives) or
   sponsor separately per your offer.
- change in focus.

What do you think?

Alex

> If there is some significant new activity, we can create new working
> groups for that.


>
> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are
> welcome.
>
> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in
> MEXT. We could not have completed all the work we did without your
> energy and push for high quality results. We would also like to
> thank Jouni for taking on this new challenge, and Julien for
> continuing the work in this space.
>
> Jari and Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>