IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301

Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A381F0CCD for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NucttKEKArRr for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA501F0CCB for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so22119968pzk.9 for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=QecY6duxmgOaTRDADObEWA+WzE/odk7cZ21uaVJlot8=; b=L5q6kT36FrC+hv60ILAsKWlCnv+iW4pbhLVJybZMoJfJuIGOZtHzWr20nYOZPQK37L A2zlkUlFA5HM1KOfRI7TMbZJdVo5gBNL193MJboflo6O3RrGodm3doKpBtOSCadOORNp Q2d53CpzdJ5Vye4KlpQn7lSzdhNwv6FUFdjW8=
Received: by 10.68.33.164 with SMTP id s4mr24264611pbi.119.1317234504623; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.110.116] ([206.132.173.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm10017610pbq.11.2011.09.28.11.28.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcecmV4iOywuzK-Hm_ErJTNkNhcSU5_pkRjvDJe8AR=JJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:28:22 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C1346BD6-DF63-40F9-B0B5-9FD6E5FAB5D8@gmail.com>
References: <CAC8QAcecmV4iOywuzK-Hm_ErJTNkNhcSU5_pkRjvDJe8AR=JJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:25:36 -0000

Hi Behcet

Thanks for the message. I believe there are  plenty of potential issues MEXT group can solve...

ryuji

On 2011/09/27, at 14:59, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> Hi all,
>   Have you seen this recently issued RFC 6301? I suggest taking a look at it. Good survey from way back 1991 to this date, thanks to Ryuji.
> It covers protocols like LISP and GTP (yes, GTP) and raises the issue of interworking such as between Mobile IP and HIP, I would add Mobile IP and SIP mobility.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email