IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group

"Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> Fri, 04 November 2011 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6004921F8C5C for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.393
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.206, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUN57MnmFykP for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6582621F8C58 for <mext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=hYGeZJ979feqa2tBlJHf6vZPpIk97Btuo80VrZK+zkLu8QQSQ3t4yxWv7vPugmOB; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [138.111.58.2] (helo=[172.17.96.136]) by elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>) id 1RMND3-0000YP-Da; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:05:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4EB41B60.90105@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:05:36 -0700
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Organization: Wichorus Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
References: <4EB2D421.4030905@earthlink.net><CAD9800F.1D0F9%hesham@elevatemobile.com><CACvMsLG496pFVaVM0aJzt9W+=kwAwJjMNru4OO45aK66iDhhgw@mail.gmail.com><1672201A-C652-4204-99D9-3DE4D23D2BB2@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcc85DKuerWsZC9S_C7bUzhdgSr9Z5yMFNngjtTcaoZv+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcc85DKuerWsZC9S_C7bUzhdgSr9Z5yMFNngjtTcaoZv+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956d5d4673fe7faad86c49200b6689bc8aaef5f97bee3c996a4350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 138.111.58.2
Cc: mext@ietf.org, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:05:43 -0000

Hello Behcet,


On 11/4/2011 9:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> I am confused about all these very high level, intelligent looking
> comments, and I must say I am fed up with them :-).

- I'm guessing you don't wish to restrict to only stupid comments.
- Do you mean that only low-level comments are of interest?
   That doesn't seem appropriate in response to the proposal to
   shut down the working group...?

> Non-tunneled communications is already there in DMM. You connect to the
> nearest HA and all new communications is non-tunneled.

That doesn't provide IP address continuity, does it?

> Do we agree that we should differentiate client-based and network based
> protocols and discuss them in different places?

If I understand your point, this is the status quo, right?

> or even there is no issue for one.

I did not understand the point of that.

> I think this is what we should decide now.

I'm not sure what "this" means in your sentence.

Regards,
Charlie P.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email