Re: [MEXT] Comments about draft-gundavelli-mext-dsmip-ipv4-overlap

Hi Romain,

Thanks for the review.

I think we missed the prefix part, we can add some considerations around
that.

Will all fix the below issues.

Regards
Sri

On 6/27/11 3:55 PM, "Romain KUNTZ" <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com> wrote:

> Hi Sri,
> 
> I came through draft-gundavelli-mext-dsmip-ipv4-overlap, and was wondering
> whether it would make sense to take also prefix overlap into consideration.
> DSMIPv6 allows the assignment of a whole IPv4 prefix through the use of the P
> flag in the IPv4 Home Address option, which could make prefix overlap likely
> to occur. It may be worth mentioning in the document.
> 
> A few other minor comments:
> - section 3.2, there is an unrelated reference to [RFC3775]
> - section 4.1.1, I would add that the "context identifier field" comes from
> the GRE Key Header (and cite RFC5845)
> - section 4.1.2: s/"with the home address option"/"with the IPv4 home address
> option"
> - I would move section 5 to the beginning of section 4. That would makes
> section 4.1.2 more clear.
> 
> Regards,
> Romain
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext