IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 18 February 2011 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7283A6F9B; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.205
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.394, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AwAwiOBqQPTh; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48EF3A6E4D; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so536456fxm.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:36:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kUyZvaeaw39fVry6qBfnBqIpdf08nXY2tRHKyOArMos=; b=AsqJn2ypHo4yk3Z5TfralvmO8kUfSq40YsxrFNOaijA8RzWctEXzN0qDbN7VhM8I+v erwAySTpCYvaFLVrL6r/9Q1IwzXeaQI0AbhM6IgLmLzL23P/I4pdLFXY/z5f5WCL3d8W fQ8wMdQJNvd2XwUyTT10zUYBjy8Vx3buM0LnE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Xnt8tQPAK2L58/gZmIJOBvCzVDpHYxVGwofBZX374TWxOTZwO336kM0szJk1sg0GpB kfEwmCrE0nwoWRCOGY+AGgDc+fgrHAAWeqSLiU5XNhnDUVli7HOCZIs6KvDmc6jShLsv qEN79MyrbYAMElhSY4h+5fe6nOIot5txwqYxs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.103.8 with SMTP id i8mr1543421fao.47.1298061324279; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.74.142 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D5ED5E5.3080905@piuha.net>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjTq+_AgF-JTT+agyxNyRt0kVsoFG2yxZ3wvRu@mail.gmail.com> <4D5ED5E5.3080905@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:24 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6XywaJ5ScydzCP4N8piqroVX9CDegv6+JVfar@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:35:56 -0000

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> I think the focus should be on determining how to use the existing protocols
> for optimal distribution. If you start from a gap analysis it would set the
> focus on finding some case where this isn't possible.

That makes sense.

--julien

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email