Re: [MEXT] IETF-81

"Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl> Sun, 10 July 2011 05:56 UTC

Return-Path: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32C521F85E6; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 22:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qOClWAoVV91; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 22:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl (denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A29E21F85AA; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 22:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.cs.utwente.nl (janus.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.26]) by denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id p6A5tDUv018331; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 07:55:13 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from 84.82.109.231 (auth. user karagian@imap1.ewi.utwente.nl) by webmail.cs.utwente.nl with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 05:56:58 +0000
To: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 05:56:57 +0000
X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.13 (On: webmail.cs.utwente.nl)
Message-ID: <sgXUqoPu.1310277417.7978520.karagian@ewi.utwente.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4E187072.30902@earthlink.net>
From: Georgios Karagiannis <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
Bounce-To: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
Errors-To: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 130.89.10.11
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0rc3 (denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.11]); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 07:55:24 +0200 (MEST)
Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 05:56:57 -0000

Hi Charlie

Thanks for the information!

Best regards,
Georgios

On 7/9/2011, "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>Hello folks,
>
>I think that vehicular networking discussions could be
>at least initiated in the [manet] working group.
>AODV and OLSR have been adapted for vehicular, and
>much more could be done there.  Mesh has also been
>discussed in [manet].
>
>Regards,
>Charlie P.
>
>
>On 7/9/2011 2:44 AM, Georgios Karagiannis wrote:
>> Hi Dirk, Hi Alexandru
>>
>> I am also interested in having a f2f meeting in Quebec to discuss
>> vehicular topics!
>>
>> As I already understood, this meeting does not need to be seen as a MEXT
>> meeting.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Georgios
>>
>> On 7/4/2011, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de"<Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>> I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
>>> Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Dirk
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota
>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
>>> An: mext@ietf.org
>>> Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
>>>
>>> Hi Julien and all,
>>>
>>> Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
>>> "Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
>>> discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
>>> consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
>>> will be needed.
>>>
>>> Please take a look at the following I-D:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your support,
>>> --
>>> Hidetoshi
>>>
>>> (2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
>>>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>>>>
>>>> --julien&   marcelo
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MEXT mailing list
>>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>MEXT@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext