Re: [MEXT] [dmm] DMM demo

Romain KUNTZ <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com> Fri, 02 March 2012 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B226521E8033 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:17:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-JSPHYq7A-A for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:17:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog104.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog104.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0771F21E803D for <mext@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:17:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob104.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1EOu2dDyCv9kr/17qsdsFevg3Zxfuxx@postini.com; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:17:37 PST
Received: by mail-pw0-f53.google.com with SMTP id jt11so2680271pbb.12 for <mext@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com designates 10.68.229.5 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.229.5;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com designates 10.68.229.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.229.5]) by 10.68.229.5 with SMTP id sm5mr19038994pbc.82.1330712251375 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.229.5 with SMTP id sm5mr15860747pbc.82.1330712251157; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from obayashi-t43.paloalto.toyota-itc.com ([206.132.173.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm5608292pba.6.2012.03.02.10.17.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Romain KUNTZ <rkuntz@us.toyota-itc.com>
In-Reply-To: <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C4620238414D@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <24781946-D433-4A8C-9116-2543C6E183EC@us.toyota-itc.com>
References: <494B8B97-093D-4886-88D7-F1A2EF065BB4@gmail.com> <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C46202383F89@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <A04D869C2B2C1A47B9E8EFFFDEE7F6EA046EDBB0@008-AM1MPN1-032.mgdnok.nokia.com> <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C4620238414D@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
To: pierrick.seite@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7m90uOwl6xzGOQbo+uOH3guGxB00lJr4CZYjJskw5qN2MdeS0i8PVQKHHVynuiH4GrmK7
Cc: ext-bruno.faria@nokia.com, dmm@ietf.org, mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] DMM demo
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:17:39 -0000

Hello Pierrick,

Just for my information, is your implementation based on UMIP (http://www.umip.org)?

Thanks,
Romain

On Mar 2, 2012, at 1:43, <pierrick.seite@orange.com> <pierrick.seite@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi Bruno,
> 
> Thanks for your interest. The demo illustrates a PMIPv6 based distributed mobility on a Wifi network, with 2 or 3 wifi APs. We show IP continuity on a video streaming. The network architecture is as per draft-seite-dmm-dma where access routers implement both MAG and LMA functions (see attached slides for more details); i.e. PMIP runs only between AR. Dynamic mobility is also shown: PMIP signaling comes into play only when the MN performs handover otherwise, standard IP routing applies. Regarding implementation, Network elements and streaming server are Linux virtual machines, all on a single laptop. 
> 
> I hope to see you at the demo :-)
> Pierrick
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : ext-bruno.faria@nokia.com [mailto:ext-bruno.faria@nokia.com]
>> Envoyé : jeudi 1 mars 2012 22:10
>> À : SEITE Pierrick RD-RESA-REN; mext@ietf.org
>> Cc : dmm@ietf.org
>> Objet : RE: DMM demo
>> 
>> Hello Pierrick,
>> 
>> That seems to be very interesting.
>> Can you point out some information about that implementation?
>> 
>> Rgds,
>> 
>> - Bruno
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>>> ext pierrick.seite@orange.com
>>> Sent: quinta-feira, 1 de março de 2012 09:04
>>> To: mext@ietf.org
>>> Cc: dmm@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [MEXT] DMM demo
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We will take the opportunity of the IETF#83 to show a demonstration of
>>> distributed mobility management (DMM), based on the following draft:
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-seite-dmm-dma-00.txt
>>> 
>>> We will make the demo after DMM meeting (03/29), during lunch time.
>> I'll
>>> communicate the exact location as soon as I'm able to.
>>> 
>>> BR,
>>> Pierrick
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> <DMA-DMM.pdf>_______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm